Same-Sex Partnership Debate in Slovenia: Between Declarative Support and Lack of Political Will

Direct democratic instruments are increasingly applied in many European countries. They are subject to an ongoing public—and often highly controversial—debate. The question of how direct democracy relates to equality, i.e. if direct democratic instruments have the potential to foster equality or if they lead to more inequality, is crucial in this debate. Research has struggled to come up with a general answer to this question with scholars assuming equality as well as inequality-promoting effects of direct democratic outputs. In this paper, we try to shed new light on this controversial debate and argue that the impact of direct democracy on equality essentially depends on the social and political context in which the decisions take place. In order to examine the impact of context factors on direct democratic outputs, we first analyze the influence of country-specific variables such as the level of equality and the age of democracy—applying large-N multilevel logistic regressions. Yet, these statistical analyses offer no clear results: the effects of the country-specific variables are rather blurry and hard to make meaning of. The result suggests that other factors than the ones we included in the regressions are decisive for the effect of direct democratic instruments on equality. Therefore, in a second step, we demonstrate how country-and case-specific variables such as social and political characteristics impact the outcomes of direct democracy, using the same-sex marriage referendums in Ireland and Slovenia in 2015 as examples. We conclude that context factors are too complex to be grasped in a large-N, statistical analysis. This means that to understand how context influences the effects of direct democratic instruments on equality, for now, one has to go beyond the lens of statistical analysis and look at the respective cases in great depth and detail.

show abstract

Who are the haters? A corpus-based demographic analysis of authors of hate speech

Hilte

Markov

Ljubešić

et al. 2023

Front. Artif. Intell.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionWe examine the profiles of hate speech authors in a multilingual dataset of Facebook reactions to news posts discussing topics related to migrants and the LGBT+ community. The included languages are English, Dutch, Slovenian, and Croatian.MethodsFirst, all utterances were manually annotated as hateful or acceptable speech. Next, we used binary logistic regression to inspect how the production of hateful comments is impacted by authors' profiles (i.e., their age, gender, and language).ResultsOur results corroborate previous findings: in all four languages, men produce more hateful comments than women, and people produce more hate speech as they grow older. But our findings also add important nuance to previously attested tendencies: specific age and gender dynamics vary slightly in different languages or cultures, suggesting that distinct (e.g., socio-political) realities are at play.DiscussionFinally, we discuss why author demographics are important in the study of hate speech: the profiles of prototypical “haters” can be used for hate speech detection, for sensibilization on and for counter-initiatives to the spread of (online) hatred.

show abstract

Same-Sex Partnership Debate in Slovenia: Between Declarative Support and Lack of Political Will

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Slovenia since 1989

Slovenia since 1989

Direct democracy and equality: context is the key

Who are the haters? A corpus-based demographic analysis of authors of hate speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About