2018
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2018.1431834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salting-in of neopentane in the aqueous solutions of urea and glycine-betaine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the encountering of end groups can be observed with a certain fraction, it is not sufficient to determine if the encountered end groups form a stable physical junction or cluster. To assess the stability of clusters, potentials of mean force (PMFs) are commonly employed. ,, Hence, we performed calculations of the PMFs between the terminal groups employing the following equation W ( r ) = prefix− k normalB T log ( g false( r false) ) where k B denotes the Boltzmann constant in kJ mol –1 /K, T represents the system’s temperature, and g ( r ) corresponds to the RDF between the terminal groups. Figure illustrates the PMFs between the two terminal groups, displayed as a function of the distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the encountering of end groups can be observed with a certain fraction, it is not sufficient to determine if the encountered end groups form a stable physical junction or cluster. To assess the stability of clusters, potentials of mean force (PMFs) are commonly employed. ,, Hence, we performed calculations of the PMFs between the terminal groups employing the following equation W ( r ) = prefix− k normalB T log ( g false( r false) ) where k B denotes the Boltzmann constant in kJ mol –1 /K, T represents the system’s temperature, and g ( r ) corresponds to the RDF between the terminal groups. Figure illustrates the PMFs between the two terminal groups, displayed as a function of the distance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our framework, the interactions governing solvent–solvent, solvent–solute, and solute–solute dynamics are considered to be pairwise additive, encompassing both Lennard-Jones and Columbic components. Complete details of methodology and simulation protocols can be found in our previous work. , The PMF are extensively used to determine the stability of the contact pair, solvent-assisted pair, solvent-shared pair, and solvent-separated pair. , The computation of the ion pair’s PMF, denoted as W ( r ), within the solvent milieu is achievable through the approach, which has been discussed extensively in our previous work and defined as W ( r ) = prefix− r 0 r normalΔ F ( r ) normald r + 2 k B T ln r r 0 …”
Section: Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potentials of mean force (PMF) has been extensively utilized to unveil the ion pairing within ILs in aqueous solutions as well as ion pairing in mixed polar mixtures. Notably, the structural and dynamic attributes of water-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium IL mixtures exhibit dependence on both anion hydrophobicity and cation chain length . Meanwhile, Chen et al have extensively employed molecular force fields to simulate both the crystalline and liquid states of [BMIM]Cl as well as its binary mixtures with ethanol, shedding light on their structural characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several simulations studies concluded that a favourable dispersion interaction between urea and hydrophobic moieties is responsible for the higher population of unfolded conformations of hydrophobic polymers or less positive solvation free energies of hydrophobic molecules in urea–water relative to neat water. 2,9,10,33–37 It was also found using model hydrophobic solutes (except methane) that hydrophobic solvation is more favourable in a urea–water mixture as the dispersion energy contribution is more favourable in aqueous urea solution in comparison to that in pure water. 33,34 For the same reason, the association of large hydrophobic molecules is reduced to a certain extend in urea–water compared to that in pure water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, TMAO prevents the denaturing ability of urea and helps a protein to stay in its folded form in aqueous urea–TMAO solution. Several theoretical and experimental studies have addressed the destabilizing effect of urea, 1–10 the stabilizing effect of TMAO and the role of TMAO to counteract the denaturing ability of urea. 11–23 It has been shown that the preferential interaction of urea with the protein side-chains as well as protein backbone leads to an accumulation of urea around the protein's solvation shell and eventually causes protein unfolding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%