EGM 2007 International Workshop 2007
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.166.c_op_06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt Interpretation with Special Focus on Magnetic Data, Nordkapp Basin, Barents Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…there are units from the Lower Cretaceous (Johansen et al, 1992). This result confirms that the magnetic effects generated by the contact of saline diapirs with the Cretaceous layers, that contain ferrous minerals (siderite), are predominant when compared with those generated by discontinuities in other layers with low magnetic susceptibility (Fichler et al, 2007).…”
Section: Multiridge Analysis Of the Nordkapp Diapirssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…there are units from the Lower Cretaceous (Johansen et al, 1992). This result confirms that the magnetic effects generated by the contact of saline diapirs with the Cretaceous layers, that contain ferrous minerals (siderite), are predominant when compared with those generated by discontinuities in other layers with low magnetic susceptibility (Fichler et al, 2007).…”
Section: Multiridge Analysis Of the Nordkapp Diapirssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Other types of geophysical methods, such as magnetic and gravity techniques, can give important contributions to the interpretation and modeling of the whole salt structures, provided that data are at high resolution (e.g., Fichler et al, 2007; Geletti et al, 2014; Gernigon et al, 2011; Olesen et al, 2010; Stadtler et al, 2014). In addition, magnetic methods have low costs compared to seismic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravity and gravity gradiometry are gaining attention due to their ability to improve salt imaging (e.g., Pratson et al, 1998, Huston andSestak, 1999;Millegan, 2005;O'Brien et al, 2005;Saad, 2006;Fichler et al, 2007;Hokstad et al, 2011). The effect is due to the contrasting density of salt compared with surrounding sediments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salt interpretation including magnetic data has been rare (Prieto 1998;Fichler et al, 2007;Gernigon et al, 2011). Induced magnetic susceptibilities (from now on simply called 'susceptibilities') of sediments are caused by amount and distinct chemical forms of iron bearing minerals in the sediments (cf., Gunn 1997) and exhibit as such almost no depth dependence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%