2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2013.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt-influenced normal fault growth and forced folding: The Stavanger Fault System, North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. The presence of other faults at this depth may suggest that F2 was not a single fault but part of a ductile strand that are kinematically linked over the crest of the salt structure (e.g., Koyi and Petersen, 1993;Koyi et al, 1993a,b;Lewis et al, 2013b). Fault F2 may therefore extend beyond the interpreted lower tip or is dip-linked with additional faults at depth.…”
Section: Tectonic Evolution Of Faultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5. The presence of other faults at this depth may suggest that F2 was not a single fault but part of a ductile strand that are kinematically linked over the crest of the salt structure (e.g., Koyi and Petersen, 1993;Koyi et al, 1993a,b;Lewis et al, 2013b). Fault F2 may therefore extend beyond the interpreted lower tip or is dip-linked with additional faults at depth.…”
Section: Tectonic Evolution Of Faultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies have shown that the development of sub-parallel striking cover-restricted normal faults can be invoked by increased tilting, flexure and gravity gliding of cover sediments above basement normal faults (Vendeville et al 1995;Withjack and Callaway, 2000). Furthermore, analysis using 3D seismic datasets from the North Sea have shown a geometric and kinematic relationship between reactivation of sub-salt basement normal faults and the development of supra-salt normal fault systems, with extension in cover sediments instigated by basement normal fault reactivation Lewis et al 2013;Tvedt et al 2013). Based on our data, we interpret a potential kinematic relationship between underlying basement normal faults and the gravity-driven normal faults developed within Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rock, which is schematically expressed (Figure 4).…”
Section: Implications For Normal Fault Growth and Hydrocarbon Prospecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of gravity-driven normal faults is somewhat more complex when attempting to understand the geometric and kinematic relationship they have with underlying rifting basement faults (e.g. Jackson and Rotevatn, 2013;Lewis et al 2013;Tvedt et al 2013). Studies have documented that tilting, flexure and gravity gliding increases in sedimentary rock located directly above basement normal faults and this may invoke the growth of sub-parallel striking, cover restricted normal faults (Vendeville et al 1995;Withjack and Callaway, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zechstein Supergroup control the structural styles that develop during Middle Jurassic-to-Early Cretaceous 492 rifting (see also Lewis et al, 2013;Jackson and Lewis, 2016). Diapirism is common in hangingwall basins, 493 where autochthonous salt was thick and halite-rich (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%