Salmonella Organisms in Animal Products Used in Poultry Feeds

Watkins, J. R.; Flowers, A. I.; Grumbles, L. C.

doi:10.2307/1587676

Cited by 27 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a recent study, a total of 201 feed ingredient samples (122 animal by-products and 79 plant by-products) were collected from rendering plants and oilseed industry and it eas reported that Salmonella were present in 22.9% of samples and animal by-products had a significantly higher Salmonella contamination rate (34.4%) than plant byproducts [23] . In our study, Salmonella serovars (Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium) were determined in 32 samples of 500 rendered animal products and source of agents were in accord with Watkins et al [21] and Pomeroy et al [22] . In this study, salmonellapositive results were only in the samples obtained from feed factories.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

“…In a study carried out by Watkins et al [21] , it was reported that 28 different Salmonella strains were isolated from animal feed products and incidence was 18.5%. Pomeroy et al [22] collected 980 samples of animal feed products from 22 different states in USA and they isolated 43 Salmonella strains originated from secondary contaminations in 170 samples.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Türkiye’de Kanatlı Yemlerinde Kullanılan Rendering Ürünlerde Salmonella Varlığı ve Bunların Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılığı

Kutay¹,

Dümen²,

Keser³

et al. 2016

Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increased prevalence of Salmonella contamination in poultry has gained considerable scientific attention during last decades. In this study, a total of 500 samples of rendered animal products (meat meal, meat-bone meal, blood meal, chicken meal and feather meal) were obtained from several feed factories and rendering plants in Turkey and these samples were analyzed for Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium status. According to the results, 13, 11 and 8 samples obtained from feed factories were determined positive for Salmonella spp., Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium respectively. However, all samples obtained form rendering plants were negative. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of isolates confirmed as positive were determined by using 17 different antibiotics. It was determined that Salmonella spp. and Salmonella Enteritidis serovars were resistant to amikacin, cephazolin and erythromycin, sensitive to amoxicillin, chloramphenicol, flumoquin, phosphomycin, kanamycin, oxytetracycline, spiramycin, streptomycin, tetracycline, tobramycine and vancomycin and moderate sensitive to gentamicin, linkomycin and rifampicin.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 70%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Türkiye’de Kanatlı Yemlerinde Kullanılan Rendering Ürünlerde Salmonella Varlığı ve Bunların Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılığı

Kutay¹,

Dümen²,

Keser³

et al. 2016

Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Animal products including fish meal were frequently contaminated with enteric bacteria-salmonellae and coliform bacilli in varying numbers (Akaike et aI., 1970;Malhotra, Henderson & Tiffany, 1968;Naka & Kashiwazaki, 1972;Sakazaki & Ebi, 1960;Watkins, Flower & Grumbles, 1959). Differences were mainly due to the procedure and handling of fish meal.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bacterial contamination in feed ingredients, formulated chicken feed and reduction of viable bacteria by pelleting

Furuta¹,

Morimoto²,

Sato

1980

Lab Anim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of bacteria in steam-pelleted or crumbled chicken food was compared with the number in individual ingredients and in mash. A few bacteria were detected in white-fish meal processed Alaska pollack. Highest yields were from alfalfa meal. Colonies numbering 3.5 x 10(3)-4.2 x 10(5) were obtained by heart-infusion agar culture, and 2.1 x 10(2)-7.0 x 10(4) with deoxycholate hydrogen sulphide lactose agar, from 1 g mash. After pelleting or crumbling the number of colonies in 1 g was reduced to 0-1.9 x 10(3) and 0-3.0 x 10(0) respectively. Bacteria in the lactose medium, mostly coliform, were observed in only 1 of 18 samples.

show abstract

“…Mixed feeds appear primarily to become contaminated from the protein ingredients such as fish meal, bone meal, meat scrap, feather meal, and animal protein (Watkins et al, , 1959;V/alker e£ al,, 1961;Morehouse and Wedman, 1961;Pomeroy and Grady, 1961;Burr and Helmboldt, 1962;U,S, Department of Health, Education, andWelfare, 1954-andand Magwood, 1965), V/hereas most of the studies dealing with the presence of Salmonellae in feeds were conducted with samples obtained from manufacturers or with ingredients, this investigation dealt with feeds from farm sources, some of which were subject to contamination. Due to the nature of these sources, factors other than the feed itself must be considered in the interpretation of the findings.…”

Section: Salmonellae In Turkey Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors associated with the dissemination of Salmonellae in turkey products and processing plants

Bryan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Salmonella Organisms in Animal Products Used in Poultry Feeds

Cited by 27 publications

References 0 publications

Türkiye’de Kanatlı Yemlerinde Kullanılan Rendering Ürünlerde Salmonella Varlığı ve Bunların Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılığı

Türkiye’de Kanatlı Yemlerinde Kullanılan Rendering Ürünlerde Salmonella Varlığı ve Bunların Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılığı

Bacterial contamination in feed ingredients, formulated chicken feed and reduction of viable bacteria by pelleting

Factors associated with the dissemination of Salmonellae in turkey products and processing plants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About