2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00385.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary tumours

Abstract: The classification and management of salivary gland tumours can be problematic for a variety of reasons. These tumours are not common, and additionally show a very wide range of cell types and morphological configurations between various tumour types, and sometimes even within a single tumour mass. Microscopic interpretation of excision specimens can also be confounded by artefactual changes resulting from the increasing use of pre-operative fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Moreover, the behaviour of many of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SMSGs, in contrast to primary salivary gland tumors, occur more commonly in men . The male‐to‐female ratio in our study was 2.4:1, compared with ratios of 1.7:1 and 2.1:1 in 2 earlier studies .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMSGs, in contrast to primary salivary gland tumors, occur more commonly in men . The male‐to‐female ratio in our study was 2.4:1, compared with ratios of 1.7:1 and 2.1:1 in 2 earlier studies .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…SMSGs, in contrast to primary salivary gland tumors, occur more commonly in men. 58,59 The male-to-female ratio in our study was 2.4:1, compared with ratios of 1.7:1 and 2.1:1 in 2 earlier studies. 1,3 The greatest difference in sex was observed among patients who had malignant melanoma, with a male-to-female ratio 5.1:1 in our study cohort.…”
Section: Epidemiologycontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…A surgical approach is more appropriate for low-grade, low-stage adenocarcinomas. While the 5-year disease survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the nasopharynx is approximately 65%, non-randomized studies demonstrate a survival benefit with the involvement of a surgical approach [10]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relatively few numbers of large scale epidemiological studies and in addition, to the considerable variation in the inclusion criteria makes comparison difficult [12]. In our study SGTs consisted 5.4% of all the orofacial lesions whose biopsies were examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%