1995
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/5.8.733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary mucins: protective functions in relation to their diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We can conclude that the latter is most likely because S. mutans attachment and biofilm formation in the presence of MUC5B are significantly decreased at most time points compared to the levels in the presence of methylcellulose. There are at least three potential mechanisms by which MUC5B could protect the surface from bacterial colonization: (i) MUC5B could bind or agglutinate bacteria, which would allow planktonic bacteria to be swept out of the oral cavity with salivary flow but enhance bacterial attachment to surfaces coated with MUC5B (14,25,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), (ii) MUC5B could have the opposite effect, where its heterogeneous glycan chains repel bacteria, thereby preventing surface attachment (9,11,(45)(46)(47), or (iii) MUC5B could directly downregulate S. mutans genes involved in attachment and biofilm formation. In our case, it appears that MUC5B is repelling S. mutans and/or directly influencing genetic modifications that protect the glass and hydroxyapatite surfaces from bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.…”
Section: Sucrose Enhances S Mutans Attachment and Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can conclude that the latter is most likely because S. mutans attachment and biofilm formation in the presence of MUC5B are significantly decreased at most time points compared to the levels in the presence of methylcellulose. There are at least three potential mechanisms by which MUC5B could protect the surface from bacterial colonization: (i) MUC5B could bind or agglutinate bacteria, which would allow planktonic bacteria to be swept out of the oral cavity with salivary flow but enhance bacterial attachment to surfaces coated with MUC5B (14,25,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), (ii) MUC5B could have the opposite effect, where its heterogeneous glycan chains repel bacteria, thereby preventing surface attachment (9,11,(45)(46)(47), or (iii) MUC5B could directly downregulate S. mutans genes involved in attachment and biofilm formation. In our case, it appears that MUC5B is repelling S. mutans and/or directly influencing genetic modifications that protect the glass and hydroxyapatite surfaces from bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.…”
Section: Sucrose Enhances S Mutans Attachment and Biofilm Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mucins regulate the lubrication of the mucosal surface, benefiting physiological functions such as mastication, speech, and swallowing. Further, they prevent mucosal desiccation, based on their capacity to retain water (Nieuw Amerongen et al 1995;Humphrey & Williamson, 2001;Sonesson et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these bacteria were three strains of viridans streptococci (ie, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus gordonii, and Streptococcus mitis), which are a prominent group of bacteria in the dental plaque (32). These bacteria bind a broad spectrum of secretory proteins, such as MUC7, lactoferrin, and ␣-amylase, although the specific capacity to bind certain secretory proteins may vary from one species to another (24,35,36). Another bacterium tested was Helicobacter pylori, the causative agent of gastric and duodenal ulcers for which the oral cavity may act as a portal of entry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%