2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2016.2562626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salient Object Detection via Structured Matrix Decomposition

Abstract: Abstract-Low-rank recovery models have shown potential for salient object detection, where a matrix is decomposed into a low-rank matrix representing image background and a sparse matrix identifying salient objects. Two deficiencies, however, still exist. First, previous work typically assumes the elements in the sparse matrix are mutually independent, ignoring the spatial and pattern relations of image regions. Second, when the low-rank and sparse matrices are relatively coherent, e.g., when there are similar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
226
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(169 reference statements)
2
226
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare it with ground truth data as well as eight state-of-the-art saliency detection algorithms. The first selected model, called a structured matrix decomposition model, was recently proposed by Peng et al [23] for salient object detection. It utilized a tree-structured sparsityinducing regularization and a Laplacian regularization to complete the saliency detection (we refer to this method as SMD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare it with ground truth data as well as eight state-of-the-art saliency detection algorithms. The first selected model, called a structured matrix decomposition model, was recently proposed by Peng et al [23] for salient object detection. It utilized a tree-structured sparsityinducing regularization and a Laplacian regularization to complete the saliency detection (we refer to this method as SMD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, we carry out several application tests including saliency detection [40] and keypoint matching [41]. In Figures 5 and 6, we present the results of application tests before and after using our method.…”
Section: Application Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DBS method was compared with 27 state-of-the-art methods in Section 7.2.1. 27 state-of-the-art methods are CB [34], FT [23], SEG [44], RC [14], SVO [17], LRR [39], SF [45], GS [37], CA [33], SS [47], HS [7], TD [48], MR [24], DRFI [25], PCA [41], HM [38], GC [36], MC [40], DSR [35], SBF [43], BD [42], SMD [46], BL [32], MCDL [9], MDF [8], LEGS [10], and RFCN [11]. These methods not only are very popular but also cover many types.…”
Section: Experiments On the New Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%