2014
DOI: 10.1038/nrn3857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction

Abstract: The brain is constantly bombarded by stimuli, and the relative salience of these inputs determines which are more likely to capture attention. A brain system known as the 'salience network', with key nodes in the insular cortices, has a central role in the detection of behaviourally relevant stimuli and the coordination of neural resources. Emerging evidence suggests that atypical engagement of specific subdivisions of the insula within the salience network is a feature of many neuropsychiatric disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

97
1,364
5
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,652 publications
(1,473 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
97
1,364
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Salience could be described as the property of a stimulus that makes it differentially relevant from the others within an environment (Uddin, 2015). The attribution of salience to the surrounding environmental stimuli is an essential process for survival that allows individuals to perform adaptive behavioral responses to approach beneficial goals or avoid threatening ones (Borsook et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Cerebellum In Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salience could be described as the property of a stimulus that makes it differentially relevant from the others within an environment (Uddin, 2015). The attribution of salience to the surrounding environmental stimuli is an essential process for survival that allows individuals to perform adaptive behavioral responses to approach beneficial goals or avoid threatening ones (Borsook et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Cerebellum In Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECN, including the medial frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, and the anterior cingulate cortex, is engaged during executive function tasks that require cognitive control and working memory (Seeley et al, 2007). The SN, comprised of the anterior insula, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), the amygdala, the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area, and thalamus (Seeley et al, 2007), segregates internal and external stimuli to guide behavior (Menon and Uddin, 2010;Uddin, 2014) (Some studies have considered the amygdala to be part of the DMN (eg, Sheline et al, 2010). We here consider the amygdala to be part of the SN based on the work of Seely et al (2007) who demonstrated an independent network distinct from the ECN and the DMN that is comprised of the anterior insula, dACC, amygdala, substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area, and thalamus, as well as studies showing anatomical connectivity between the anterior insula and the amygdala (Menon and Uddin, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results similarly indicate an absence of dACC‐amygdala anti‐correlation in GAD versus HC during DM. In addition, results indicated increased frontal FC in GAD for core areas of the salience network (SN, i.e., dACC‐AI) (Menon & Uddin, 2010; Uddin, 2015), potentially indicating a hypervigilant state in GAD. Sub‐genual ACC is also involved in emotion modulation (Delgado, Nearing, Ledoux, & Phelps, 2008; Diekhof, Geier, Falkai, & Gruber, 2011; Drevets, Savitz, & Trimble, 2008; Glascher et al., 2012; Urry et al., 2006) and evidenced more positive FC with both cognitive control (i.e., dACC) and emotional (i.e., right AI) circuits in GAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The frontal regions that showed differential FC between GAD and HCs during high error feedback trials (i.e., dACC, sgACC, AI, DLPFC), are involved in salience identification, error monitoring and emotional control (Botvinick et al., 2004; Menon & Uddin, 2010; Ochsner et al., 2012; Uddin, 2015). Decreased PFC‐amygdala connectivity is perhaps the most consistent FC abnormality reported for these regions in GAD (Hilbert et al., 2014; Mochcovitch et al., 2014; Taylor & Whalen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation