2015
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2015.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting-State Connectivity Predictors of Response to Psychotherapy in Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract: Despite the heterogeneous symptom presentation and complex etiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), functional neuroimaging studies have shown with remarkable consistency that dysfunction in mesocorticolimbic brain systems are central to the disorder. Relatively less research has focused on the identification of biological markers of response to antidepressant treatment that would serve to improve the personalized delivery of empirically supported antidepressant interventions. In the present study, we inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(147 reference statements)
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, behavioral activation therapy was followed by activation changes in the paracingulate gyrus during reward selection, the right caudate nucleus during reward anticipation, and the paracingulate and orbital frontal gyri during reward feedback (Dichter et al, 2009; Dichter et al, 2010). Response of major depression to behavioral activation was predicted by pretreatment connectivity of the right insula with the right middle temporal gyrus and the left intraparietal sulcus with the orbital frontal cortex (Crowther et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, behavioral activation therapy was followed by activation changes in the paracingulate gyrus during reward selection, the right caudate nucleus during reward anticipation, and the paracingulate and orbital frontal gyri during reward feedback (Dichter et al, 2009; Dichter et al, 2010). Response of major depression to behavioral activation was predicted by pretreatment connectivity of the right insula with the right middle temporal gyrus and the left intraparietal sulcus with the orbital frontal cortex (Crowther et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response of major depression to behavioral activation was predicted by pretreatment connectivity of the right insula with the right middle temporal gyrus and the left intraparietal sulcus with the orbital frontal cortex. (29) Behavioral activation therapy was followed by activation changes in reward structures, including the paracingulate gyrus during reward selection, the right caudate nucleus during reward anticipation, and the paracingulate and orbital frontal gyri during reward feedback. (30) A paradigm requiring cognitive control in both sad and neutral contexts resulted in decreased activation in prefrontal structures (paracingulate gyrus, the right orbital frontal cortex, and the right frontal pole) during responses to cognitive control stimuli presented within a sad context in prefrontal structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, individual differences in these circuits at baseline are predictive of medication response [7]. For example, in patients with major depression, greater connectivity from insula at baseline was predictive of response to cognitive behavioral therapy [69]. …”
Section: Cognitive Control Circuitry Is Frequently Enhanced By Psychimentioning
confidence: 99%