This article presents the results of a survey to determine the degree of familiarity and usage, accuracy obtained, and evaluation of different forecasting techniques. It was found that regression analysis, subjective techniques, exponential smoothing, and moving average were well known and used for specific situations. Accuracy was relatively high for aggregate short range forecasts, but decreased for longer range and product level forecasts.KEY WORDS Businesspeople survey of forecast technique familiarity, usage and accuracy Sales forecasting is rapidly becoming one of the most crucial aspects of planning for companies. A survey of 175 midwestern businesspeople indicated that 65 per cent thought sales forecasting was very important to their company's success. An additional 28 per cent said forecasting was important although not critical (Dalrymple, 1975). Since sales forecasting is an important input to the corporate planning process, it is not surprising that surveys have been done on the use of forecasting techniques in companies (Dalrymple, 1975; Conference Board, 1970, 1971Pan, Nichols and Joy, 1977;Reichard, 1966; Sales Management, 1967;Wheelwright and Clarke, 1976). A summary of the scope of these surveys is given in Exhibit 1.The purpose of this article is to report the results of a survey to investigate the use, performance, and satisfaction of forecasting managers with current sales forecasting techniques. One objective was to determine how familiar executives are with various forecasting methods and what avenues are used to learn about new methods and applications. The avenues used indicates how managers have most effectively learned about techniques. This information should help direct other managers in the forecasting learning process.A second objective was to determine how satisfied managers are with using different forecasting techniques. This information should give an idea ofwhich techniques have been most successful in real world applications. No study has looked at the question of satisfaction in using different forecasting techniques. However, Wheelwright and Clarke (1 976) looked at the ongoing use of various methods.Readability: The Gunning Fog Index for this paper is about 15.