2003
DOI: 10.2307/3557594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sak Tz’i’, a Classic Maya Center: A Locational Model Based on GIS and Epigraphy

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Agriculture in the arid and semi-arid regions that comprise much of present-day Peru, Bolivia, and Northern Chile is heavily dependent on irrigation; however, obtaining a depend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with another carving, Lintel 3, the two lintels support the doorways of Structure 1 and lead into its three rooms with resplendent murals. By one interpretation, these paintings depict the battle, prologue, and aftermath of a conflict with the Sak Tz'i' kingdom in which these captives were taken (Anaya Hernández, Guenter, and Zender 2003;Bíró 2004;Martin and Grube 2008;Miller and Brittenham 2013). Against this view is the fact that each carving has a distinct date, and one, on Lintel 3, possibly mentions a capture some decades before-in other words, they allude to more than one conflict (for discussion of dates, see Miller and Brittenham [2013, 67] and Table 1 below).…”
Section: The Sak Tz'i' Dynastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with another carving, Lintel 3, the two lintels support the doorways of Structure 1 and lead into its three rooms with resplendent murals. By one interpretation, these paintings depict the battle, prologue, and aftermath of a conflict with the Sak Tz'i' kingdom in which these captives were taken (Anaya Hernández, Guenter, and Zender 2003;Bíró 2004;Martin and Grube 2008;Miller and Brittenham 2013). Against this view is the fact that each carving has a distinct date, and one, on Lintel 3, possibly mentions a capture some decades before-in other words, they allude to more than one conflict (for discussion of dates, see Miller and Brittenham [2013, 67] and Table 1 below).…”
Section: The Sak Tz'i' Dynastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear, however, that we require more robust theoretical and methodological frameworks through which the positions of ancient frontiers may be determined. Conjunctive approaches combining the powers of GIS, Gravity and xTent modeling, Cost Allocation and Cost Extent modeling, Spatial Clustering analysis, and epigraphic information—as has recently been presented by Anaya Hernández et al (2003) and Hare (2004)—appear to be particularly fruitful. The development of a better understanding of the qualities of frontier communities would also aid in our recognition and understanding of past frontiers.…”
Section: Ancient Maya Internal Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dates from Unit 7 suggest that the massive renovation of the Main Plaza occurred sometime from AD 667 to 777. This interval coincides roughly with a prolonged interval of conflict in the Western Maya region, including mutual captive-taking between Palenque, Toniná, and their allies; and the expansionist reigns of Baknal Chak (AD 688-727) of Toniná, K'inich Kan Balam of Palenque (AD 635-702) and Itzamnaaj Balam (Shield Jaguar III; AD 681-742) and Yaxun Balam (Bird Jaguar IV; AD 752-768) at Yaxchilán (Anaya et al, 2003;Martin and Grube, 2000;Taladoire, 2016). Significant construction activity also took place at Chinkultic ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%