2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sagittal distal limb kinematics inside the hoof capsule captured using high-speed fluoroscopy in walking and trotting horses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
9
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
9
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Different functional and kinematic properties between front and back limb 10, 11, 2) different kinematic features between walk and trot 12, 3) detection of hoof events, based on sensors placed on an adjacent body segment, and 4) interindividual variations in limb kinematics 13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Different functional and kinematic properties between front and back limb 10, 11, 2) different kinematic features between walk and trot 12, 3) detection of hoof events, based on sensors placed on an adjacent body segment, and 4) interindividual variations in limb kinematics 13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies of horse foot kinematics in both walking and trotting, which have shown that the PIP and DIP joints maintain a similar motion pattern in those gaits, with changes evident only in the amounts of rotation (Chateau, Degueurce & Denoix 2004;Clayton et al, 2007b). Whilst the greater flexion of the DIP joint relative to the PIP joint after mid-stance and at late stance is in accord with previous research on walking and trotting horses in shod and unshod conditions (Clayton et al, 2007b;Roach et al, 2015;Roepstorff, Johnston & Drevemo 1999), our study did not record extension of either the PIP or the DIP joints after the mid-stance phase of stance. This may be due to individual behaviour of the horse we used in our analysis and/or the limited space the animal walked on, and is complicated by our small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In den vorangegangenen Untersuchungen wurde zudem erhoben, dass der palmare Winkel des Hufbeins zwischen 3 -6° liegt (Caudron et al 1997, Cripps und Eustace 1999, Kummer et al 2006. Weiterhin wird das Hufgelenk als Verbindung zum Kronbein, genau wie das Fesselgelenk, als "High Motion Joint" bezeichnet, was sich auf die ausgeprägte Beweglichkeit dieser Gelenke in der sagittalen Ebene (Extension -Flexion) bezieht (Clayton 2010, Roach et al 2014. Im Gegensatz dazu wird das Krongelenk als "Low Motion Joint" bezeichnet (Mcilwraith 1982, Roach et al 2014.…”
unclassified
“…Weiterhin wird das Hufgelenk als Verbindung zum Kronbein, genau wie das Fesselgelenk, als "High Motion Joint" bezeichnet, was sich auf die ausgeprägte Beweglichkeit dieser Gelenke in der sagittalen Ebene (Extension -Flexion) bezieht (Clayton 2010, Roach et al 2014. Im Gegensatz dazu wird das Krongelenk als "Low Motion Joint" bezeichnet (Mcilwraith 1982, Roach et al 2014. Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass eine Änderung des palmaren Winkels sich insbesondere auf den Winkel von Huf-und Fesselgelenk auswirkt.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation