2009
DOI: 10.2172/962840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sage-Grouse and Wind Energy: Biology, Habits, and Potential Effects from Development

Abstract: SummaryProposed development of domestic energy resources, including wind energy, is expected to impact the sagebrush steppe ecosystem in the western United States. The greater sage-grouse relies on habitats within this ecosystem for survival, yet very little is known about how wind energy development may affect sage-grouse. The purpose of this report is to inform organizations of the impacts wind energy development could have on greater sage-grouse populations and identify information needed to fill gaps in kn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some alterations that historically have contributed to the population decline in sagegrouse include predation, pesticides, sagebrush removal, grazing, and fire (Connelly and Braun 1997). More recent declines in population numbers of sage-grouse and other sagebrush-obligate species in Wyoming have been linked to large-scale development of the landscape for energy, particularly underground reserves of oil and natural gas (Lyon and Anderson 2003;Walker et al 2007;Becker et al 2009;Harju et al 2010;Gilbert and Chalfoun 2011). This study focuses on a sensitive sagebrush-obligate species in an environment undergoing human development (i.e., oil and gas development) that has experienced population declines range-wide (Connelly and Braun 1997;Schroeder et al 2004) and is exposed to a diversity of predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some alterations that historically have contributed to the population decline in sagegrouse include predation, pesticides, sagebrush removal, grazing, and fire (Connelly and Braun 1997). More recent declines in population numbers of sage-grouse and other sagebrush-obligate species in Wyoming have been linked to large-scale development of the landscape for energy, particularly underground reserves of oil and natural gas (Lyon and Anderson 2003;Walker et al 2007;Becker et al 2009;Harju et al 2010;Gilbert and Chalfoun 2011). This study focuses on a sensitive sagebrush-obligate species in an environment undergoing human development (i.e., oil and gas development) that has experienced population declines range-wide (Connelly and Braun 1997;Schroeder et al 2004) and is exposed to a diversity of predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. High-quality wind resources overlap the range of sage-grouse, particularly in the eastern portion of the range (Becker et al 2009). FS scientists have expertise to evaluate effects of wind energy development on populations and habitat, and research on these effects on GRSG habitat use and movements is underway in Wyoming (Mark Rumble, personal communication, USDA Forest Service, Rapid City, SD, 2015;Schreiber et al 2015a,b).…”
Section: Department Of Energy 2008)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled two potential effects of wind energy infrastructure on sage-grouse: reductions in the survivorship of individuals and reductions in habitat suitability. We gathered information on the potential impact of energy infrastructure on sage-grouse survivorship from multiple sources (Becker et al 2009;Kaiser 2006). Information about the impact of various infrastructures on sage-grouse is very limited in the existing literature.…”
Section: Modeling the Impact Of Wind Development And Associated Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled these infrastructure effects as a distance-related proportional decrease in survivorship (i.e., survivorship increases with distance from infrastructure). A linear function was developed based on published data indicating the quantitative relationship between proximity to infrastructure and survivorship derived from observed effects of infrastructure on survivorship for three age classes at different distances (Becker et al 2009;Kaiser 2006) (Figure 10). We assumed a linear relationship between survivorship and distance for simplicity, and the slope value was determined from the points that make up the relationship.…”
Section: Modeling the Effects Of Wind Energy 19mentioning
confidence: 99%