Safety profile of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in infants and children: additional data from a phase III randomized controlled trial in sub-Saharan Africa
Abstract:A phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00866619) in sub-Saharan Africa showed RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy against malaria. We now present in-depth safety results from this study. 8922 children (enrolled at 5–17 months) and 6537 infants (enrolled at 6–12 weeks) were 1:1:1-randomized to receive 4 doses of RTS,S/AS01 (R3R) or non-malaria control vaccine (C3C), or 3 RTS,S/AS01 doses plus control (R3C). Aggregate safety data were reviewed by a multi-functional team. Severe malaria with Blantyre… Show more
“…Evidence from settings with very good access to antimalarial treatment are consistent with our findings. In a malaria vaccine (RTS,S) trial setting, with clinical care being part of the trial design, the ratio of the proportion of SMA versus CM amongst severe cases in 5-to 7-monthold children was lower than that observed in our data for the same age group (SMA versus CM: 5.0 for RTS,S trial and 9.0 for our pooled data set) [69]. This may suggest SMA cases are more amenable to prevention by treatment than CM cases.…”
The impact of delayed treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria on progression to severe malaria: A systematic review and a pooled multicentre individual-patient meta-analysis. PLoS Med 17(10): e1003359.
“…Evidence from settings with very good access to antimalarial treatment are consistent with our findings. In a malaria vaccine (RTS,S) trial setting, with clinical care being part of the trial design, the ratio of the proportion of SMA versus CM amongst severe cases in 5-to 7-monthold children was lower than that observed in our data for the same age group (SMA versus CM: 5.0 for RTS,S trial and 9.0 for our pooled data set) [69]. This may suggest SMA cases are more amenable to prevention by treatment than CM cases.…”
The impact of delayed treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria on progression to severe malaria: A systematic review and a pooled multicentre individual-patient meta-analysis. PLoS Med 17(10): e1003359.
“…This is explained by the fact that any rare complication is less likely to occur when the group of subjects is small. continuous monitoring is important in case of complications that occur with delayed effect (40). during a pandemic, these sequential studies may be shortened and partially overlapped, but it is important that thousands of vaccinated people are followed for several months before the general purpose vaccine is approved.…”
In the current context of the pandemic triggered by SARS-cOV-2, the immunization of the population through vaccination is recognized as a public health priority. In the case of SARS-cOV-2, the genetic sequencing was done quickly, in one month. Since then, worldwide research has focused on obtaining a vaccine. This has a major economic impact because new technological platforms and advanced genetic engineering procedures are required to obtain a cOVId-19 vaccine. The most difficult scientific challenge for this future vaccine obtained in the laboratory is the proof of clinical safety and efficacy. The biggest challenge of manufacturing is the construction and validation of production platforms capable of making the vaccine on a large scale.
“…A WHO-commissioned systematic review provided more equivocal evidence, concluding that receipt of DTP was associated with a possible increase in all-cause mortality on average (relative risk 1.38, 95% CI 0.92-2.08), with the effect seeming stronger in girls than in boys [12]. The safety profile of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in infants and children in sub-Saharan Africa also showed that the effect of vaccination on all-cause mortality was substantially modified by sex, with higher all-cause mortality in girls but not in boys [14,15]. These observations have led some scientists to propose that nonlive vaccines-despite providing specific protection against targeted diseases-may have detrimental nonspecific effects (NSEs) on overall morbidity and mortality rates in recipients in high-mortality populations, and that these effects are more pronounced in females [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic remains controversial [11], as much of the evidence is from studies with high risk of bias conducted in a limited range of settings [12,13]. The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine-another nonlive vaccine-is also associated with higher all-cause mortality in female but not male children [14,15]. More generally, both safety and immunogenicity of vaccines are shown to be influenced by sex [16][17][18][19], and greater consideration must be given to sex as a biological variable in vaccine studies.…”
To achieve global elimination of human rabies from dogs by 2030, evidence-based strategies for effective dog vaccination are needed. Current guidelines recommend inclusion of dogs younger than 3 months in mass rabies vaccination campaigns, although available vaccines are only recommended for use by manufacturers in older dogs, ostensibly due to concerns over interference of maternally-acquired immunity with immune response to the vaccine. Adverse effects of vaccination in this age group of dogs have also not been adequately assessed under field conditions. In a single-site, owner-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in puppies born to mothers vaccinated within the previous 18 months in a high-mortality population of owned, free-roaming dogs in South Africa, we assessed immunogenicity and effect on survival to all causes of mortality of a single dose of rabies vaccine administered at 6 weeks of age. We found that puppies did not have appreciable levels of maternally-derived antibodies at 6 weeks of age (geometric mean titer 0.065 IU/mL, 95% CI 0.061–0.069; n = 346), and that 88% (95% CI 80.7–93.3) of puppies vaccinated at 6 weeks had titers ≥0.5 IU/mL 21 days later (n = 117). Although the average effect of vaccination on survival was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% CI 0.83–2.18), this effect was modified by sex (p = 0.02), with the HR in females 3.09 (95% CI 1.24–7.69) and the HR in males 0.79 (95% CI 0.41–1.53). We speculate that this effect is related to the observed survival advantage that females had over males in the unvaccinated group (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11–0.70), with vaccination eroding this advantage through as-yet-unknown mechanisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.