Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: An experimental verification

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable tool for musculoskeletal imaging. The presence of metal, however, raises concerns. The potential risks are loosening and migration of the implant, heating of the metal with surrounding tissue, causing thermal damage, and artifactual distortion which compromise the diagnostic value of the procedure. The aim of this study was to test experimentally the nature and extent of the first two of these effects in orthopedic implants. The degree of ferromagnetism was evaluated by deflection studies at the portals of a 0.25 Tesla permanent magnet and 1.0 Tesla clinical MRI scanner. None of the orthopedic implants exhibited any attraction. External fixator clamps, however, showed significant ferromagnetism. The heating of implants by ''worst-case'' scenario imaging sequences was insignificant. Many contemporary nonferromagnetic orthopedic implants can be imaged safely. It is prudent, however, to perform ex vivo deflection studies on a duplicate implant to confirm MR compatibility. With external fixator devices exhibiting strong ferromagnetism, MRI should be avoided. With expanding indications for MRI, orthopedic implants are unlikely to limit the potential of this powerful tool. ß

A Cadaveric Simulation of Distal Femoral Traction Shows Safety in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

“…This finding directly contradicts earlier studies using stainless steel implants 3,13,14 and suggests that as higher strength magnets (ie, 3 T) are introduced into clinical use, repeat testing of orthopaedic implants should occur. Previous ''weakly ferromagnetic'' implants may not be MRI-compatible using the higher strength magnet.…”

Introducer Needles of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Assessment of Magnetic Field Interactions with 1.5T and 3T MR Systems

“…However, this is the method adopted in the literature. 3,5,11 In conclusion, from the standpoint of MR safety, SUS 304 should not be selected to make introducer needles, and although inconel 600 is the pre-ferred material, the SUS 316L introducer showed little magnetic interaction in the 3T MR system and may be more practical with some modiˆcation.…”

Advances in Imaging of Vertebral and Spinal Cord Injury

“…Safety should always be borne in mind before MRI is performed, especially in the setting of acute spinal injury (13)(14)(15)(16)(17). It must always be recognized that the main magnetic field is 100,000 times more powerful than the ambient terrestrial magnetic field.…”