2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety assessment of trees used as anchors in cable-supported tree harvesting based on experimental observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, that supports the decision made by the European Standardization Agency (Technical Committee 144, Working Group 8) to decrease the skyline safety factor from 3 to 2.5 for those yarders equipped with a calibrated slip brake on the skyline drum, like the machines included in this and in the 2017 study. Of course, even if the level of overloading applied by the operators in these tests is likely representative of general practice, there will always be the occasional operator who may push the envelope (Marchi et al 2019;Mologni et al 2019). In that regard, it is worth recalling that the study was conducted during a salvage operation, where trees had not been felled systematically according to a welldefined plan but had been windthrown and were especially hard to disentangle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, that supports the decision made by the European Standardization Agency (Technical Committee 144, Working Group 8) to decrease the skyline safety factor from 3 to 2.5 for those yarders equipped with a calibrated slip brake on the skyline drum, like the machines included in this and in the 2017 study. Of course, even if the level of overloading applied by the operators in these tests is likely representative of general practice, there will always be the occasional operator who may push the envelope (Marchi et al 2019;Mologni et al 2019). In that regard, it is worth recalling that the study was conducted during a salvage operation, where trees had not been felled systematically according to a welldefined plan but had been windthrown and were especially hard to disentangle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some researchers conducted non-destructive pulling test studies to predict the tree anchorage. Some predictive results have been obtained as well [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Failures of natural anchors, together with excessive cable tensile forces, are indeed primary safety concerns in all cable-supported harvesting systems (Tsioras et al 2011). Various publications have recently focused on assessing these safety concerns in cable yarding, both in terms of cable tensile forces (Harrill and Visser 2016; Mologni et al 2019Mologni et al , 2021b as well as anchor stability of various cable yarding operations (e.g., Mancuso et al 2018;Marchi et al 2019Marchi et al , 2021. While cable tensile forces can be effectively monitored and eventually controlled, anchor loading capacity is still largely overlooked because of the missing availability of operational solutions for their actual assessment and monitoring, and still too little is known about the behavior of trees and stumps used to anchor cables (Cavalli 2012; Marchi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%