ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 7 2010
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2010-25049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity for Loss of Coolant Accident Conditions

Abstract: One of the critical issues for Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) structural integrity is related to the Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) event. Therefore, within the framework of safety assessments special emphasis is given to the effect of PTS-loadings caused by the non-uniform azimuthal temperature distribution due to cold water plumes or stripes during emergency coolant injection. The paper describes the method used to predict the thermal mechanic boundary conditions (system pressure, wall temperature). Using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ω-based Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) showed slightly improved results. Using relatively coarse mesh, Beukelmann et al (2012) simulated the same case with the SST-kω model (Menter, 1994) and the results showed reasonable agreement for the temperature distributions in the cold leg, but no comparisons were shown for measurement stations in the downcomer. The same modeling approach was used also to study real nuclear power plant conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…An ω-based Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) showed slightly improved results. Using relatively coarse mesh, Beukelmann et al (2012) simulated the same case with the SST-kω model (Menter, 1994) and the results showed reasonable agreement for the temperature distributions in the cold leg, but no comparisons were shown for measurement stations in the downcomer. The same modeling approach was used also to study real nuclear power plant conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%