2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Assessment of Implemented NextGen Operational Improvements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, in regard to the research perspective, a relevant example is represented by SATIE (security of air transport infrastructure of Europe) project [27], which has analyzed the cyber and physical threat scenarios typical of attacks that threaten airport infrastructures and the results of a risk analysis applied to these scenarios. Instead, reference [28] presents an example of the data-driven approach for risk assessment, using radar-tracking data to estimate precursors that may lead to unsafe outcomes related to traffic separations.…”
Section: Security Incidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in regard to the research perspective, a relevant example is represented by SATIE (security of air transport infrastructure of Europe) project [27], which has analyzed the cyber and physical threat scenarios typical of attacks that threaten airport infrastructures and the results of a risk analysis applied to these scenarios. Instead, reference [28] presents an example of the data-driven approach for risk assessment, using radar-tracking data to estimate precursors that may lead to unsafe outcomes related to traffic separations.…”
Section: Security Incidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Borener et al (2016), since NextGen programs have been implemented recently, it was difficult to measure their impact on safety through traditional metrics such as the number of accidents and/or incidents. To anticipate what may lead to unsafe operations, the authors evaluated how changes in separation standards through wake vortex classification may lead to unsafe outcomes based on historical data such as the counts of wake, proximity, and anomalous trajectory events in two 30-day samples, respectively in the pre-and post-implementation of wake recat at MEM.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%