1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80525-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and efficacy of intravenousdiltiazem in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypotension was the most common side effect, occurring in 13 % of patients. Symptomatic hypotension was present in 3.6 % of patients, and responded to normal saline solution in all cases [291]. Similar beneficial actions were seen in another, placebo controlled study involving 113 AF or AFL patients without severe HF [292] as well as in 37 AF or AFL patients with moderate to severe congestive HF [293].…”
Section: Anipamil Animal Studies With Anipamilsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Hypotension was the most common side effect, occurring in 13 % of patients. Symptomatic hypotension was present in 3.6 % of patients, and responded to normal saline solution in all cases [291]. Similar beneficial actions were seen in another, placebo controlled study involving 113 AF or AFL patients without severe HF [292] as well as in 37 AF or AFL patients with moderate to severe congestive HF [293].…”
Section: Anipamil Animal Studies With Anipamilsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…IV diltiazem has been shown to slow ventricular rates in 94% of patients with AF within a median time of four minutes. 5 In this same study, there was a 13% incidence of hypotension, with 3.6% of patients requiring boluses of saline. In a separate study, IV diltiazem was shown to be effective in the treatment of AF in patients with moderate to severe CHF.…”
Section: Controlling Ventricular Ratementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Both beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are effective and well tolerated therapies for heart rate control in AF [26,27], and can be used in a wide range of clinical situations (acute and long-term) and in combination when single agent therapy is insufficient [18]. Both classes of agents have the added benefit of contributing to control of hypertension.…”
Section: The Case For Rate Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%