In patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, a routine strategy of rhythm control does not reduce the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, as compared with a rate-control strategy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00597077.)

Background-It is unknown if brief episodes of device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) increase thromboembolic event (TE) risk. Methods and Results-TRENDS was a prospective, observational study enrolling patients with Ն1 stroke risk factor (heart failure, hypertension, age Ն65 years, diabetes, or prior TE) receiving pacemakers or defibrillators that monitor atrial tachycardia (AT)/AF burden (defined as the longest total AT/AF duration on any given day during the prior 30-day period). This time-varying exposure was updated daily during follow-up and related to TE risk. Annualized TE rates were determined according to AT/AF burden subsets: zero, low (Ͻ5.

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published R ESUM ELe programme de lignes directrices de la Soci et e canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) en matière de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) a et e elabor e pour aider les cliniciens à prendre en charge ces patients complexes, ainsi que pour orienter les d ecideurs politiques et les systèmes de soins de sant e sur des questions connexes. La dernière edition

Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy, and there are potential advantages, such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects, with the rate-control strategy. Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients.

No abstract