2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00841-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and activity of WX-0593 (Iruplinalkib) in patients with ALK- or ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion trial

Abstract: WX-0593 (Iruplinalkib) is a novel, highly selective oral ALK and ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). In this study, the safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of WX-0593 were evaluated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement. In the dose-escalation phase and dose-expansion phase, patients were treated with WX-0593 until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or subject withdrawal. In the dose-escalation phase, the primary endpoints were maximum to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety profile of conteltinib was similar but not identical to other ALK TKIs. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 14.1% in patients who received conteltinib in this study, while 24% in crizotinib [4], 49% in ceritinib [27], 36% in brigatinib [28], 23% in ensartinib [16], 26% in alectinib [29], and 35% in iruplinalkib [17]. In terms of drug-related gastrointestinal toxicities which are some of the most frequently reported AEs in ALK TKIs, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting occurred in 35.9-71.9% patients in this study of conteltinib, mostly were grade 1-2 and in early stages of treatments, while 39-56% in crizotinib [4], 65-82% in ceritinib [27], 11-36% in ensartinib [16], 21-53% in brigatinib [28], < 10% in alectinib [29], and 14-34% in iruplinalkib [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The safety profile of conteltinib was similar but not identical to other ALK TKIs. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 14.1% in patients who received conteltinib in this study, while 24% in crizotinib [4], 49% in ceritinib [27], 36% in brigatinib [28], 23% in ensartinib [16], 26% in alectinib [29], and 35% in iruplinalkib [17]. In terms of drug-related gastrointestinal toxicities which are some of the most frequently reported AEs in ALK TKIs, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting occurred in 35.9-71.9% patients in this study of conteltinib, mostly were grade 1-2 and in early stages of treatments, while 39-56% in crizotinib [4], 65-82% in ceritinib [27], 11-36% in ensartinib [16], 21-53% in brigatinib [28], < 10% in alectinib [29], and 14-34% in iruplinalkib [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Several second-generation ALK TKIs, such as ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and iruplinalkib, and third-generation ALK TKIs, such as lorlatinib, have been developed to overcome crizotinib resistance. These ALK TKIs have achieved clinical benefits in crizotinib-refractory patients, with a median PFS of 6.9-12.9 months [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Moreover, in ALK TKI-naïve, ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients, these ALK TKIs are more efficacious, with a median PFS of 18.4-34.8 months [13,16,17,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other novel ALK TKIs include TQ-B3139 ( 88 ), WX-0593 ( 89 ), PLB-1003 ( 90 ), SAF-189s ( 91 ), and CT-707 ( 92 ). Several other ALK TKIs are under preclinical investigation, such as gilteritinib ( 93 ) and XMU-MP-5 ( 94 ).…”
Section: Alk Targeted Therapies In Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%