Objectives Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are very common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to explore the clinical impact of osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), on CNS metastases in patients with advanced NSCLC in real-world setting. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC who received osimertinib after progression of early-generation EGFR-TKIs and CNS metastases on baseline brain scan were retrospectively collected. Primary outcomes were disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), time to tumor response, median best percentage change from baseline in CNS target lesion (TL) size and safety.

Purpose Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has demonstrated substantial clinical benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were resistant to early-generation EGFR-TKIs and had acquired a T790M mutation. The aim of our study was to identify the mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib and to correlate them with clinical outcomes. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced NSCLC who received osimertinib for T790M-mutated acquired resistance to prior EGFR-TKIs between March 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Patients with paired molecular data of preosimertinib and after resistance development, which were not confirmed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation, were included in the molecular analysis set. Results Of 49 patients evaluated in the molecular analysis set, 24 patients maintained T790M mutation, while 25 patients exhibited T790M-loss. Molecular modifications were identified in 27 of 49 patients including EGFR acquired mutations (C797S, C796S, G796S, V802I, V834L, E758D and G724S), non-EGFR-dependent mutations (PIK3CA, ALK, BRAF, KRAS and TP53), EGFR amplification and MET amplification. At data cutoff, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months in the T790M-retain group compared with 7.8 months in T790M-loss patients (P = 0.053). Median PFS was significantly longer in patients with EGFR-dependent resistance mechanism (13.5 months) than in those with alternative pathway activation (8.2 months; P = 0.012). Conclusions The study revealed heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib in advanced NSCLC patients and their association with clinical outcomes. Patients who maintained T790M mutation or with EGFR-dependent resistance mechanism had longer clinical outcome benefits.

BackgroundExtensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression and relapse, despite high initial response rates to chemotherapy. The primary objective of this trial was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of amrubicin and cisplatin (AP) combination therapy compared with the standard first-line regimen of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) for previously untreated ED-SCLC in a Chinese population. When non-inferiority was verified, the objective was switched from non-inferiority to superiority.MethodsFrom June 2008 to July 2010, 300 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to AP and EP groups. AP-treated patients received cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) and amrubicin (40 mg/m2, days 1–3) once every 21 days. EP-treated patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1–3) once every 21 days. Treatment was continued for four to six cycles, except in cases of progressive disease or toxicity, and patient refusal.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) for AP vs. EP treatment was 11.8 vs. 10.3 months (p = 0.08), respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of AP to EP (AP group: 95 % confidence interval for hazard ratio 0.63–1.03 months). Median progression-free survival and overall response rates for AP vs. EP groups were 6.8 vs. 5.7 months (p = 0.35) and 69.8 % vs. 57.3 %, respectively. Drug-related adverse events in both groups were similar, with neutropenia being the most frequent (AP 54.4 %; EP 44.0 %). Leukopenia, pyrexia, and fatigue were more prevalent in the AP group, but all were clinically reversible and manageable.ConclusionsAP therapy demonstrated non-inferiority to EP therapy, prolonging OS for 1.5 months, but this difference was not statistically significant; thus we propose AP as a promising treatment option for ED-SCLC in China.Trial registrationThis trial was registered on 10 April 2008 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00660504).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2301-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Lung cancer is the most common cancer as well as the leading cause of cancer-related mortalities worldwide. Macrophages are the most abundant immune cells in primary and metastatic tumors, and contribute to tumor initiation, progression and metastasis. Macrophages have been shown to demonstrate a high level of plasticity, with the ability to undergo dynamic transition between M1 and M2 polarized phenotypes. In the present study, we investigated a pivotal role of miR-130a in macrophage polarization and whether it was associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), using RT-qPCR and western blot analyses. The in vitro experiments showed that miRNA-130a was expressed at a higher level in M1 compared to M2 macrophages. The enforced expression of miR-130a in macrophages resulted in a significantly increased production of proinflammatory cytokines, whereas deletion of miR-130a impaired the M2‑associated gene expression and led to an M1-biased response. Mechanistically, the bioinformatics analysis revealed that proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a potential target of miR-130a. Additionally, the luciferase assay confirmed that PPARγ translation was suppressed by miR-130a through the interaction with the 3'UTR of PPARγ mRNA. A subsequent analysis revaled that the induction of miR-130a suppressed PPARγ protein expression. In NSCLC patients, the results showed that miR-130a downregulation exhibited clinical relevance as it was correlated with poor prognosis and increased tumor stage and metastasis. In addition, miR‑130a was inversely correlated with the macrophage marker, CD163, and target gene, PPARγ. Taken together, the results established miR-130a as a molecular switch during macrophage development and as a potential target for the treatment of NSCLC.

BRAF mutation is an oncogenic driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with low frequency. The data of patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations is rare. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in Chinese patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations between Jan 2017 and Jul 2019. A total of 65 patients treated in 22 centers were included, 54 harbored BRAF-V600E mutation and 11 had non-V600E mutations, including K601E, G469S, G469V, G469A, G596R, G466R, and T599dup. Of 18 patients with early-stage disease at diagnosis and underwent a resection, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 43.2, 18.7, and 10.1 months of stage I, II, and IIIA patients, respectively. In 46 patients with advanced-stage disease at data cutoff, disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line anti-BRAF targeted therapy was superior than chemotherapy in patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutation (DCR, 100.0 vs. 70.0%, P = 0.027; median PFS, 9.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.149). Of 30 V600E-mutated patients who received anti-BRAF therapy during the course of disease, median PFS of vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and dabrafenib plus trametinib was 7.8, 5.8, and 6.0 months, respectively (P = 0.970). Median PFS were similar between V600E and non-V600E patients (5.4 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.825) to first-line chemotherapy. Nine patients were treated with checkpoint inhibitors, with median PFS of 3.0 months. Our data demonstrated the clinical benefit of anti-BRAF targeted therapy in Chinese NSCLC patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutation. The value of immunotherapy and treatment selection among non-V600E population needs further study.

No abstract

Background Extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) is deemed as a fatal malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy has gradually played an important role in the treatment of ES‐SCLC since 2018, ES‐SCLC treatment data and patient outcome before 2018, when chemotherapy served as a fundamental therapeutic strategy, is still meaningful as a summary of the situation regarding previous medical treatment and is a baseline for comparative data. In addition, the prognostic factors of ES‐SCLC have failed to reach a consensus until now. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate survival and identify the prognostic factors in an ES‐SCLC population. Methods We retrospectively collected the detailed medical records of 358 patients with ES‐SCLC from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 in a Chinese top‐level cancer hospital. The prognostic factors were evaluated by Cox univariate and multivariate analysis. Results The median overall survival (OS) of ES‐SCLC patients ( N = 358) was 14.0 months, the one‐ and two‐year OS rates were 56.2% and 21.7%, respectively. Moreover, we identified two demographic characters (age ≥ 70, smoking index ≥ 400), one tumor burden factor (bone multimetastasis), two tumor biomarkers (cyfra211, CA125) and two laboratory indexes (decreased Na, PLR < 76) as independent prognostic factors for OS in this patient population. Progression‐free survival (PFS) data of 238 patients was obtained for further analysis, and the median PFS was 6.2 months, and six‐month and one‐year PFS rates were 51.7% and 14.3%, respectively. Elevated cyfra211, decreased Hb and Na were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusions This study provides real‐world evidence of the survival and prognosis of ES‐SCLC patients which will enable better evaluation and clinical decision‐making in the future.

Background. Because of rapid disease progression and lack of optimal treatment strategies beyond the second-line, the prognosis of patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) still remains depressing. Alternative treatment strategies are required to improve their prognosis. In this prospective clinical study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single-agent apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. Materials and Methods. Twenty-two patients with ES-SCLC treated with 500 mg single-agent apatinib as subsequentline regimen in our institution from November 2016 to August 2018 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).Results. Clinical outcomes included partial response in 3 patients (13.6%), stable disease in 18 patients (81.8%), and disease progression in 1 patient (4.5%), with an ORR of 13.6% and DCR of 95.5%. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 10.0 months, respectively. Apatinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile, with grade I-III secondary hypertension and proteinuria as the most common AEs. No grade IV and V AEs were observed among the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed secondary hypertension as an independent predictor of OS (p = .047); however, the association became insignificant after Q correction (p = .455). Conclusions. Apatinib was safe and effective in the management of patients with ES-SCLC and can be considered as a treatment option after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT02995187 The Oncologist 2020;25:e833-e842Implications for Practice: This study indicated the acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy of apatinib in the management of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after failure from at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. Secondary hypertension can be a potential prognostic factor for apatinib treatment.