2011
DOI: 10.1145/1877714.1877716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety alternating automata on data words

Abstract: A data word is a sequence of pairs of a letter from a finite alphabet and an element from an infinite set, where the latter can only be compared for equality. Safety one-way alternating automata with one register on infinite data words are considered, their nonemptiness is shown ExpSpace-complete, and their inclusion decidable but not primitive recursive. The same complexity bounds are obtained for satisfiability and refinement, respectively, for the safety fragment of linear temporal logic with freeze quantif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we show that the satisfiability problem for Safety MTL is non-elementary by reduction from the termination problem for ICMETs. We note that in a similar vein, an EXPSPACE lower bound for the complexity of satisfiability of an extension of Linear Temporal Logic on data words was given in [Laz11] via a reduction from the termination problem for counter machines with incrementation errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this paper we show that the satisfiability problem for Safety MTL is non-elementary by reduction from the termination problem for ICMETs. We note that in a similar vein, an EXPSPACE lower bound for the complexity of satisfiability of an extension of Linear Temporal Logic on data words was given in [Laz11] via a reduction from the termination problem for counter machines with incrementation errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A few works such as [31], [35], [36] are on words, while in most applications we need to consider trees. Moreover, these works are incomparable to some interesting existing formalisms [17], [6], [2], [12], [24], [14], [29] known to be able to capture various interesting scenarios common in practice. On top of that many useful techniques, notably those introduced in [17], [8], [6], [24], can deal only with data equality, and are highly dependent on specific combinatorial properties of the formalisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Adding one more register or past time operators, such as X −1 or U −1 , to LTL ↓ 1 (X, U) makes the satisfiability problem undecidable. In [29] a weaker version of alternating RA 1 , called safety alternating RA 1 , is considered, and the emptiness problem is shown to be EXPSPACE-complete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work. Automata over infinite data words have been introduced to prove decidability of satisfiability for many kinds of logic: LTL with freeze quantifier [31]; safety fragment of LTL [32]; F O with two variables, successor, and equality and order predicates [33]; EMSO with two variables, successor and equality [34]; generic EMSO [35]; EMSO with two variables and LTL with additional operators for data words [36]. The main result for these papers is decidability of nonemptiness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%