2018
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2018.1426426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safeguarding the public trust: Teaching organizational dissent in an era of political polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Real democracy" is a term that we have coined to represent the ways that Dewey's democratic principles of engagement, service, and citizenship exist in our present world, a world where the provision of government services increasingly occurs outside the control of government agencies (Warner & Hefetz, 2008), where these agencies rely more heavily on technologies to screen and service clients (Eubanks, 2017), and where government must continuously prove its trustworthiness (Kettl, 2018;Roberts, 2018). Private companies, data scientists, and technology corporations are increasingly replacing public sector services and administrators (Eubanks, 2017); and, although some of the threats to democracy are as old as the system itself, new advances in technology and privacy (Eubanks, 2017) coupled with increasing demands to provide more services with fewer public dollars (Brown & Potoski, 2003) have impacted the application of substantive ideals of democracy within the public sector.…”
Section: The Rise Of "Real Democracy"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Real democracy" is a term that we have coined to represent the ways that Dewey's democratic principles of engagement, service, and citizenship exist in our present world, a world where the provision of government services increasingly occurs outside the control of government agencies (Warner & Hefetz, 2008), where these agencies rely more heavily on technologies to screen and service clients (Eubanks, 2017), and where government must continuously prove its trustworthiness (Kettl, 2018;Roberts, 2018). Private companies, data scientists, and technology corporations are increasingly replacing public sector services and administrators (Eubanks, 2017); and, although some of the threats to democracy are as old as the system itself, new advances in technology and privacy (Eubanks, 2017) coupled with increasing demands to provide more services with fewer public dollars (Brown & Potoski, 2003) have impacted the application of substantive ideals of democracy within the public sector.…”
Section: The Rise Of "Real Democracy"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, they entered the field of battle as it had been defined by Bannon. Scholars condemned attacks on the administrative state, offered defenses of the administrative state, and explained why the administrative state was “something to celebrate” (Heidari‐Robinson ; Michaels , 40; Rahman , 1675; Resh ; Roberts ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors survey public affairs faculty to learn their views on empathy and how they teach the value to their students. In issue's last article specifically on trust, Roberts (2018) details how the nation's alarmingly political polarization is harming the public's trust in bureaucracy and public servants. To address this "moral" issue, Roberts argues that public affairs programs need to teach current and future public servants about political polarization and how to push back against organizational misconduct.…”
Section: Introduction To the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%