2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe haven laws as crime control theater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The term crime control theater is also applicable, whereby the policy does not provide a viable solution for a real crime, but rather functions as a socially constructed answer to a socially constructed problem (Griffin & Miller, 2008;Hammond, Miller, & Grffin 2010). In essence, the policy/law is a solution looking for a problem.…”
Section: Moral Panic and Legislationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term crime control theater is also applicable, whereby the policy does not provide a viable solution for a real crime, but rather functions as a socially constructed answer to a socially constructed problem (Griffin & Miller, 2008;Hammond, Miller, & Grffin 2010). In essence, the policy/law is a solution looking for a problem.…”
Section: Moral Panic and Legislationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In essence, the policy/law is a solution looking for a problem. These types of memorialization laws, enacted to reduce a harm and bring about good, are often hypothesized to make us feel secure and protected, but may realistically incur a false sense of security, or at least a misconceived perception of the true harm (Armstrong, Miller, & Griffin, 2015;Griffin & Miller, 2008;Hammond et al 2010;.…”
Section: Moral Panic and Legislationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Registration and community notifi cation laws, as well as other pieces of legislation that will be discussed throughout this chapter, exemplify the concept of " Crime-Control Theater " (Armstrong et al, 2015 ), which refers to policies that address societal fears about crime, but that are not necessarily based in fact or practicality. Such policies typically leave root causes of crime, or even common manifestations of crime, unaddressed, while focusing disproportionate attention on sensationalized cases (Armstrong et al, 2015 ;Hammond, Miller, & Griffi n, 2010 ). Not only are these policies largely ineffective, but they have a number of collateral consequences that may actually make the community less safe than if they were never enacted in the fi rst place.…”
Section: Registration and Community Notifi Cationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Roughly 0.2 percent of pregnancies are hidden from a pregnant woman's family and social network. 11 Legislators have failed to partner with at-risk women as well as subjectmatter experts, resulting in uninformed and inappropriate policy. 10 Legislators gloss over these issues to such an extent that some scholars describe safe haven laws as driven by impulsivity or "moral panic."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. hastily enacted" by legislators, as being of "dubious [and] empirically doubtful" efficacy, 7 and as akin to a mere "band-aid." 8 These critical assessments of safe haven laws stem from six key shortcomings:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%