2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe conception for HIV-discordant couples: insemination with processed semen from the HIV-infected partner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-nine studies in this review reported washing semen using a technique invented by Semprini in 1989 (Table 1) (8). Some studies used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect HIV DNA and RNA in the washed semen fractions (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Twenty-nine studies in this review reported washing semen using a technique invented by Semprini in 1989 (Table 1) (8). Some studies used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect HIV DNA and RNA in the washed semen fractions (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Couples may risk sexual HIV transmission in order to achieve pregnancy if they do not have access to safer reproductive methods (4, 6, 7). Semen washing is a safer reproductive strategy that HIV-discordant couples in which the male is infected can use to achieve pregnancy (8). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This raises the question regarding the risks involved for the surrogate mother should the commissioning father be HIV-positive. In such a situation, it is assumed that sperm washing (to eliminate the chances of HIV infection [9][10][11][12][13] ) would be utilised to minimise the chance of infection of the surrogate mother.…”
Section: Legal Duties At Common Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the man is HIV positive: sperm washing with intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization is the strategy that offers the lowest transmission risk 33 . The disadvantages are high cost and low availability in most public health services.…”
Section: Risk Reduction In Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%