2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saccadic peak velocity as an alternative index of operator attention: A short review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The human pupil size can regulate the amount of light that enters the eye [ 83 ]. The pupil size, which is the most popular eye-movement index for mapping mental workloads [ 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 ], not only reacts to luminance changes but also reflects cognitive processing. Moreover, pupil size is negatively correlated with the light conditions but is positively correlated with problem difficulty, that is, greater pupillary dilations are observed when the luminance is decreased or the difficulty of the problem is increased [ 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human pupil size can regulate the amount of light that enters the eye [ 83 ]. The pupil size, which is the most popular eye-movement index for mapping mental workloads [ 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 ], not only reacts to luminance changes but also reflects cognitive processing. Moreover, pupil size is negatively correlated with the light conditions but is positively correlated with problem difficulty, that is, greater pupillary dilations are observed when the luminance is decreased or the difficulty of the problem is increased [ 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, gaze metrics represent one of the most valid, reliable, and objective indices to assess operator performance [21][22][23], including physicians [24,25]. Specifically, in surgical scenarios, gaze metrics have been used to quantify surgical skills [25][26][27], to study differences between novice and expert surgeons [21,28,29], and to analyze surgeon' scanning behavior [30,31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such questionnaires, easy to administer and interpret, have several methodological caveats, however. Their standard offline administration (paper and pencil test), for example, does not allow for continuous evaluation of CP (Di Stasi, Marchitto, Antol ı, & Cañas, 2013). Thus, the ability to objectively and sensitively measure operator CP online in real scenarios remains a major challenge .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%