2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sa1436 G-EYE Advanced Colonoscopy for Increased Polyp Detection Rate- Randomized Tandem Study With Different Endoscopist -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the balloon inflated during withdrawal, colonic folds and flexures are mechanically straightened revealing potential suspicious lesions located in their proximal aspect[ 62 ]. Two randomized tandem studies[ 63 , 64 ] evaluated G-EYE’s lesions miss rates compared to SFV. Both studies examined individuals undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons.…”
Section: "Add-on” Colonoscopy Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the balloon inflated during withdrawal, colonic folds and flexures are mechanically straightened revealing potential suspicious lesions located in their proximal aspect[ 62 ]. Two randomized tandem studies[ 63 , 64 ] evaluated G-EYE’s lesions miss rates compared to SFV. Both studies examined individuals undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons.…”
Section: "Add-on” Colonoscopy Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies examined individuals undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons. Halpern et al[ 63 ] demonstrated a significant lower adenoma miss rate for G-EYE (7.5% vs 44.7%, P = 0.0002), while Rey et al[ 64 ] showed a lower polyp miss rate in favor of the G-EYE (7% vs 41%). In terms of ADR and adenomas per colonoscopy this device has been evaluated in three randomized parallel design studies[ 65 - 67 ].…”
Section: "Add-on” Colonoscopy Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant increase in adenoma detection rate was reported with the new system (35.4 % vs. 23.5 %) as well as an increased proportion of adenomas per patient (0.63 vs. 0.36). Another report from Germany, comparing G-EYE with conventional colonoscopy and including 45 patients, reported an increase in polyp detection rate in favor of G-EYE (with a 100 % additional detection of adenomas) and a significant reduction in polyp miss rate (18.6 % for G-EYE vs. 48 % for conventional colonoscopy) [36]. One of the study's most interesting features is that although the design was a back-to-back study, the endoscopists changed after each withdrawal in order to reduce bias, which has been a criticism of previous tandem studies [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%