Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names

Tsaparina, D. M.; Bonin, Patrick; Méot, Alain

doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0121-9

Cited by 64 publications

(118 citation statements)

References 68 publications

(121 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The correlation we found for AoA and concreteness (-.37) parallels those found in English (-.51; Schock et al, 2012), Portuguese (-.53; Marques et al, 2007), and Italian (-.38; Barca et al, 2002). With regard to imageability, the correlation between AoA and imageability in the present study was also negative (-.32), but smaller than those found in other languages, such as Russian (-.60; Tsaparina et al, 2011), Portuguese (-.70; Marques et al, 2007), and Italian (-.70; Barca et al, 2002).…”

Section: Relationship With Other Psycholinguistic Variablessupporting

confidence: 59%

“…High internal consistency measures and high correlations with existing Turkish AoA data (Raman, 2006) showed that the present norms constitute a reliable and valid tool for researchers working with Turkish material. The similarity of the correlation patterns among the lexical variables in the present study and those in other languages (e.g., Álvarez & Cuetos, 2007;Bird, Franklin, & Howard, 2001;Schock, Cortese, & Khanna, 2012;Stadthagen-Gonzalez & Davis, 2006;Tsaparina et al, 2011) bolster the confidence in the present AoA norms as a valid tool.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Subjective age-of-acquisition norms for 600 Turkish words from four age groups

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main purpose of this study was to report agebased subjective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for 600 Turkish words. A total of 115 children, 100 young adults, 115 middle-aged adults, and 127 older adults provided AoA estimates for 600 words on a 7-point scale. The intraclass correlations suggested high reliability, and the AoA estimates were highly correlated across the four age groups. Children gave earlier AoA estimates than the three adult groups; this was true for high-frequency as well as low-frequency words. In addition to the means and standard deviations of the AoA estimates, we report word frequency, concreteness, and imageability ratings, as well as word length measures (numbers of syllables and letters), for the 600 words as supplemental materials. The present ratings represent a potentially useful database for researchers working on lexical processing as well as other aspects of cognitive processing, such as autobiographical memory.

show abstract

Section: Relationship With Other Psycholinguistic Variablessupporting

confidence: 59%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Subjective age-of-acquisition norms for 600 Turkish words from four age groups

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another important variable in the picture normalizing procedure is conceptual familiarity, which is referred to as the degree to which people are engaged in or think of a particular concept in their daily life (Tsaparina et al, 2011). Conceptual familiarity is an important predictor of naming reaction times, and it has been established that more familiar concepts are named faster (Hirsh & Funnell, 1995).…”

Section: Portuguesementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These stimuli were selected on the basis of a number of variables that affect the memory process (Pompeia, Miranda, & Bueno, 2001). Snodgrass and Vanderwart's method was enthusiastically welcomed not only in English, but also in other languages such as Greek (Dimitropoulou, Dunabeitia, Blitsas, & Carreiras, 2009), Russian (Tsaparina, Bonin, & Méot, 2011)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A new set of 272 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: Persian norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pictures are often used in studies on memory, perception, and language; normative data are thus needed for such visual stimuli. In the present study, we aimed to obtain normative data for a set of 272 black-and-white pictures from middle-aged and elderly Persian speakers. A total of 206 volunteers were divided into two groups: a middle-aged (40-59 years old) group and an elderly (60 years old and over) group. The groups had similar characteristics in terms of education. Norms for every picture were developed to provide measures of name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, age of acquisition, and visual complexity. The results revealed that all of these measures vary with age, except for conceptual familiarity.

show abstract

“…Tsaparina and colleagues (2011) reported norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, imageability, and age of acquisition in Russian. The word frequency counts were included in the Tsaparina et al (2011) study and were taken from the New Frequency Dictionary of Russian Vocabulary incorporating over 150 million words (Lyashevskaya and Sharov, 2008). All the participants were native Russian speakers living in St. Petersburg.…”

Section: Russian Orthography and Its Significance For Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task

Volkovyskaya

Raman

Baluch

2017

Writing Systems Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AoA is a unique psycholinguistic variable because of its link to the semantic architecture of the mental lexicon (e.g., Brysbaert, Wijnendaele & de Deyne, 2000). The role of AoA on free recall has been examined in English (Coltheart & Winograd, 1986;Dewhurst, Hitch & Barry, 1998) and recently in Turkish (Raman, Raman, Ikier et al, under revision) with contradictory outcomes. While an overall advantage was found for late acquired items in English, the contrary was reported in Turkish. Furthermore, this effect appeared to be modulated by frequency and whether items were presented in pure or mixed lists. The present study extends Raman et al study to monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1) -English (L2) speakers in order to understand the extent to which AoA affects free recall. One interesting aspect of Russian writing system is that it consists of Cyrillic and Roman letters, hence creating a shared orthographic medium in Russian-English bilinguals. Participants were allocated to either picture or word condition and subsequently to either pure list or mixed list condition. Both monolingual Russian (N=42) and bilingual (N=40) Russian (L1) -English (L2) data show a robust main effect for AoA in free recall irrespective of list type for words and for pictures and no significant interactions. Overall, early acquired words and pictures had an advantage over late acquired items. These findings are contrary to what has been reported in the literature for monolingual English speakers (Dewhurst et al, 1998) but in line with findings for Turkish (Raman et al, under revision) and will be discussed within the monolingual and bilingual theoretical frameworks.

show abstract

Russian norms for name agreement, image agreement for the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures and age of acquisition, conceptual familiarity, and imageability scores for modal object names

Cited by 64 publications

References 68 publications

Subjective age-of-acquisition norms for 600 Turkish words from four age groups

Subjective age-of-acquisition norms for 600 Turkish words from four age groups

A new set of 272 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: Persian norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, and age of acquisition

Age of acquisition (AoA) effect in monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian (L1)-English (L2) speakers in a free recall task

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About