2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural-urban appraisal of the prevalence and factors of depression status in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our survey also suggests that 17.8% of respondents reported probable anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 10) and 23.6% of respondents reported high-exposure ACE scores (≥4). Our data showed that probable depression, probable anxiety, and ACE prevalence varied across the nine provinces in the country, supporting earlier studies, which reported that differences in mental health risk exist across geographical areas of South Africa (13,31). Based on previous literature presenting evidence that mental health risk has significant associations with poverty (18, 32) and with higher prevalence previously reported in rural areas (33,34), this could have resulted in the diverse prevalence of mental health risk we report across the provinces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our survey also suggests that 17.8% of respondents reported probable anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 10) and 23.6% of respondents reported high-exposure ACE scores (≥4). Our data showed that probable depression, probable anxiety, and ACE prevalence varied across the nine provinces in the country, supporting earlier studies, which reported that differences in mental health risk exist across geographical areas of South Africa (13,31). Based on previous literature presenting evidence that mental health risk has significant associations with poverty (18, 32) and with higher prevalence previously reported in rural areas (33,34), this could have resulted in the diverse prevalence of mental health risk we report across the provinces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to Srinivasan et al, (2020) found about one in six adult women living in a rural area was depressed. Likely, Hu et al, (2019) found that the crude predicted probability of depression caseness was the highest in the rural group and similar to finding by Onuh et al, (2021) found the factors which significantly depressed respondents with incomes. The study found that in 2020, during the pandemic of COVID-19, it was found that prevalence of depressive disorders in Thailand and Roi Et province were 1.65% and 1.59% respectively, the prevalence depressive disorders in Roi Et province was 1.93%, which is higher than in any previous year.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Unfortunately, we did not find the average or distribution of CESD-R scores among a similar population to the present study in published manuscripts, even though validations were carried out in Arabic, Indonesian, and other languages [ 18 , 19 ]. However, studies using other questionnaires indicated that the extent of depressive symptoms varies in populations, and the depressive degrees among community-dwellers in rural areas such as those in the present study were lower [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%