Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey

Abstract

This article uses data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to compare travel behavior in rural and urban areas of the U.S. As expected, the car is the overwhelmingly dominant mode of travel. Over 97% of rural households own at least one car vs. 92% of urban households; 91% of trips are made by car in rural areas vs. 86% in urban areas. Regardless of age, income, and race, almost everyone in rural areas relies on the private car for most travel needs. Mobility levels in rural areas are generally higher than in urban areas. That results from the more dispersed residences and activity sites in rural areas, which increase trip distances and force reliance on the car. Somewhat surprisingly, the rural elderly and poor are considerably more mobile than their urban counterparts, and their mobility deficit compared to the rural population average is strikingly less than for the urban elderly and poor compared to the urban average. Data limitations prevented a measurement of accessibility, however, and it seems likely that rural areas, by their very nature, are less accessible than urban areas, especially for the small percentage of car-less poor and elderly households.

Daily spatial mobility and transport behaviour in the Czech Republic: pilot study in the Písek and Bystrice and Pernštejnem regions

“…Certain types of regions (rural, city, small-town, suburban) may also be considered, given their distinctive socio-economic conditions, specic as to the level of and demand for spatial mobility. In this context, the studies by Pucher and Renne (2005) or Nutley (2005) state that the need for higher mobility is a characteristic feature of non-urban areas, as the people living in them are forced to satisfy their common everyday needs, as a rule, in towns and cities that are further away. Similarly increased demand for mobility is newly exhibited by the suburban areas where the people, in some cases, have to rely on services and other socio-economic activities located in the central towns.…”

Travel behaviour of seniors in Eastern Europe: a comparative study of Brno and Bratislava

“…The analyses provide insightful and rather unexpected results, at least in an international context [1,4,14]. Public transport and walking are the most frequent travel modes in both cities initially.…”

“…The latter alternative applies in particular when there is no mode-choice alternative present or when costs of the alternative (including its attractiveness) are high [13]. As a result, in cities and rural areas with insufficient public transport service a passenger car may be the crucial element of mobility, whereas in dense urban areas it could be replaced with different mode choices [14,15].…”

“…All in all, passenger cars remain the favourite transportation mode for people older than 64 in Western Europe [4], the United States [14], or Australia [1]. Various factors can influence this situation.…”

Rural Residents’ Perception of Construction Project Delays in Pakistan

“…Market access is also more demanding because of job market competition. Mobility levels in rural regions are usually higher than in urban areas [75], and rural residents travel 59% more miles per day than their urban counterparts [76]. Rural residents travel to or from urban areas through roads, which are the main pillar between rural and urban areas.…”