2014
DOI: 10.1188/14.onf.e211-e219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Living as Context: A Study of Disparities in Long-Term Cancer Survivors

Abstract: Survivor context (e.g., level of rurality) influences HRQOL outcomes. Context or culture-relevant risk minimization and HRQOL optimization nursing practices are indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These individual-level factors may also mediate the relationships between systemic-level factors and HRQOL [11]. Previous research has applied the Contextual Model to investigate HRQOL determinants in ethnic minority and rural BCS [1216]; however, only one of these included African American women. Other studies have applied this framework to the investigation of predictors of related outcomes (e.g., depressive symptoms, physical quality of life) [11, 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individual-level factors may also mediate the relationships between systemic-level factors and HRQOL [11]. Previous research has applied the Contextual Model to investigate HRQOL determinants in ethnic minority and rural BCS [1216]; however, only one of these included African American women. Other studies have applied this framework to the investigation of predictors of related outcomes (e.g., depressive symptoms, physical quality of life) [11, 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an impact of living in rural locations can be found in long-term survivors of cancer when health-related quality of life is assessed (Pedro & Schmiege, 2014). Rurality also impacts on social function and financial difficulty.…”
Section: Remotenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Australia have provided further evidence showing that cancer deaths were higher in inner regional areas than major cities [13,14] . A correlation was also seen with lower SES, demonstrating that 39% of patients with poorer cancer outcomes were living in remote areas, compared to 24% in rural areas and only 17% in major cities.…”
Section: Remotenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, those living in rural and remote areas, particularly men, were less likely to have considered cancer prevention messages and more likely to engage in lifestyle behaviors associated with a greater cancer risk, such as e.g. tobacco smoking and harmful levels of alcohol intake over time [13,14] . Also risk factors such as obesity and overweight were 10% higher in absolute terms in regional and rural areas, while sedentary behavior applied to 60% compared to 54% in major cities [8,13,14] .…”
Section: Remotenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation