1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.1983.tb00060.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Geography at Utrecht

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical implications of mathematical practice in geography and the tension between idiographic and nomothetic research had been digested in the first wave already. Moreover, sensibilities learned in the first wave did trickle down in the second, making that when Dutch quantitative geography was finally codified in a textbook, it hardly had a strong positivist theoretical signature (Hauer and Van der Knaap, 1973). For better or for worse, it is historically false to say that Dutch quantitative geography stands in the footsteps of the American quantitative revolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical implications of mathematical practice in geography and the tension between idiographic and nomothetic research had been digested in the first wave already. Moreover, sensibilities learned in the first wave did trickle down in the second, making that when Dutch quantitative geography was finally codified in a textbook, it hardly had a strong positivist theoretical signature (Hauer and Van der Knaap, 1973). For better or for worse, it is historically false to say that Dutch quantitative geography stands in the footsteps of the American quantitative revolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the theoretical foundation for a renewed interest in the study of (peripheral) rural areas was laid by a senior lecturer with a long history of research experience behind him, Joeke Veldman, who unfortunately passed away in 1984. He emphasized the contrast between periurban rural areas and peripheral rural areas where the socio-spatial system and the physical-spatial structure respectively predominate (Hauer and Veldman, 1983). Access and accessibility were the key concepts in a time-space approach within the Utrecht department, in the style of the School of Lund and inspired by the manner in which British researchers such as Moseley and Cloke applied these principles to their evaluation of planning.…”
Section: A Marginal Existence In the Third Worldmentioning
confidence: 98%