Rural entrepreneurial space and identity

Gorbuntsova, Tatiana; Dobson, Stephen; Palmer, Nicola

doi:10.1177/1465750317723220

Cited by 12 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(52 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case study areas in Mongolia it was noted that some grassroots people were unprepared for the exclusion from their traditional grazing land that materialized when tourism companies with business ideas and money were allowed by officials to operate on their land. There are spatialities of power in evidence here (Gorbuntsova et al 2018) -with local grassroots actors reporting that they faced oppression if they did not possess high level (authority-based) social connections.…”

Section: Distributive Justice In Tourism Benefits and Burdensmentioning

confidence: 97%

Equity in tourism development: procedural (in)justice and distributive justice in Mongolia, East Asia

Dorjsuren¹,

Palmer²

2018

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers procedural justice and distributive justice as a means of examining equity in tourism development. The geographical focus of the paper is Mongolia-historically a unitary sovereign socialist state in East Asia that, in common with Central Asian republics and in contrast to other parts of the eastern sub-region of the Asian continent (China, Korea, Japan and Taiwan), has been shaped by Stalinist Soviet Union policies. This particular context is interesting, not only in terms of consolidation of power, and economic, political and social transition, but also with respect to the nature of material wealth and livelihood options. Equity in tourism development in two rural Mongolian regions is explored with specific reference to the concepts of procedural justice and distributive justice. Drawing on political ecology and actor-oriented approaches, the paper considers equity from the perspectives of five actor groups: local grassroots people in two geographical areas; private sector tourism operators; Government officials; International Development Organizations and academics; and NGOs. Three periods of fieldwork were conducted, providing qualitative interview data, complemented by non-participant observations, and secondary data. Framework analysis is applied as an analytic induction tool. Five emergent themes are discussed here relating to procedural (in)justice and distributive justice. Inequity was perceived to be rooted more strongly in the processes of tourism development rather than in the outcomes but the interrelated nature of process and outcome, linked to opportunities and capabilities, is noted (Sen 1984; 1992; 1999).

show abstract

Section: Distributive Justice In Tourism Benefits and Burdensmentioning

confidence: 97%

Equity in tourism development: procedural (in)justice and distributive justice in Mongolia, East Asia

Dorjsuren¹,

Palmer²

2018

AJTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, an RT firm (or enterprise) is an organisation that works to package rurality to deliver value to tourists. RT firms provide multiple services in rural tourism areas, including hospitality (Presenza et al , 2019), local tours (Gorbuntsova et al , 2018), transportation (Muresan et al , 2019) and others.…”

Section: Scope Of the Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The innovation ecosystem in rural tourism and hospitality – a systematic review of innovation in rural tourism

Madanaguli

Kaur

Mazzoleni

et al. 2021

JKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Innovation in rural tourism and hospitality (RT) is a complex process that involves the exchange of knowledge and resources between many actors and the interrelationships between those actors in the business environment. The purpose of this paper is to provide structure to this “knowledge and resource ecosystem” through a thorough systematic review of the extant literature. Design/methodology/approach The current study uses a time-tested and reproducible systematic literature review process to identify and analyse 79 research papers that have discussed innovation in RT. Findings Through content analyses, this review identifies critical stakeholders in the innovation ecosystem, as well as the enabling and hindering roles these stakeholders play in innovation. The thematic analysis uncovers three key research foci: stakeholders and their roles, outcomes of innovation and business model innovation. The review also identifies types of innovation and critically analyses the bibliographical research profile. The authors summarise the findings in an RT innovation ecosystem model, which includes the various actors and their knowledge and resource sharing roles within the business environment. Originality/value This is one of the first systematic reviews to concentrate on RT innovation and, within that focus, on knowledge and resource networks in particular rather than on innovation in tourism in general, which was the focus of prior reviews. The authors encourage cross-pollination of ideas by introducing theories from the strategic management, innovation, knowledge management and business model innovation literature wherever appropriate. To consolidate and present the findings on the innovation process’s antecedents and outcomes, the authors present an ecosystem of innovation within the RT framework.

show abstract

“…Así; el espíritu empresarial rural se muestra como una fuerza de revitalización capaz de promover la búsqueda de oportunidades para empresarios locales o foráneos, motivándolos a quedarse (Gorbuntsova, Dobson, & Palmer, 2018;Lan, Zhu, Ness, Xing, & Schneider, 2014;Sanchis, Serrano, & Köster, 2016). Esto fomenta los procesos de contraurbanización de las personas que buscan cambiar su estilo de vida y la conexión entre lo urbano y lo rural, para generar desarrollo económico (Anthopoulou et al, 2017;Stockdale, 2016).…”

Section: Actividad Fuenteunclassified

“…En este contexto, los jóvenes colombianos se han caracterizado por ser una de las poblaciones más activas en cuanto a iniciativa empresarial (GEM, 2017b), pudiendo ser una de las fuerzas que pueden revitalizar los territorios rurales, mediante el apoyo y la generación de emprendimientos en la ruralidad, tal como se ha hecho en otros países (Avramenko & Silver, 2010;Gorbuntsova et al, 2018;Hustedde, 2018;Kroesen & Darson, 2013;Lopez & Pastor, 2015).…”

Section: Francisco Javier Arias Vargasunclassified

Actividad emprendedora de los millennials en Antioquia (Colombia)

Vargas¹,

Javier²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rural entrepreneurship is a developing area and motivates the interest of governments and actors involved in the search to revitalize spaces that have historically been marginalized by the migration of the population in search of opportunities in urban areas and the escape from an armed conflict of more than 50 years as is the case of Colombia, being a country that has a large rural area that reaches 96% of the territory. • Establecer el comportamiento de la actividad emprendedora de las empresas rurales generadas por población millennial.

show abstract

Rural entrepreneurial space and identity

Cited by 12 publications

References 37 publications

Equity in tourism development: procedural (in)justice and distributive justice in Mongolia, East Asia

Equity in tourism development: procedural (in)justice and distributive justice in Mongolia, East Asia

The innovation ecosystem in rural tourism and hospitality – a systematic review of innovation in rural tourism

Actividad emprendedora de los millennials en Antioquia (Colombia)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About