2014
DOI: 10.2112/si70-001.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runup variability due to time dependence and stochasticity in the beach profiles: two extreme cases of the Spanish coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study aims at providing a first-order estimate, R is here computed using empirical formulae. For instance, Diaz-Sanchez et al 85 mention that the scatter between empirically predicted and observed R can be due to local processes that are not represented by the formulations' predictors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study aims at providing a first-order estimate, R is here computed using empirical formulae. For instance, Diaz-Sanchez et al 85 mention that the scatter between empirically predicted and observed R can be due to local processes that are not represented by the formulations' predictors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of empirical formulae exist to estimate wave setup and runup. Recent studies have extensively tested the most commonly used ones (e.g., Atkinson et al, 2017; Cohn & Ruggiero, 2016; Di Luccio et al, 2018; Díaz‐Sánchez et al, 2014; Ji et al, 2018; O'Grady et al, 2019; Passarella et al, 2018; Power et al, 2019; Pullen et al, 2007; Sénéchal et al, 2011; Stockdon et al, 2014; Vousdoukas et al, 2012). These studies have shown the significant skills of these formulae in different study cases and their ability to outperform process‐based models for R 2% (Stockdon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider different cases for β: β lc : Locally observed, time‐invariant beach face slope. We used the data set of Barboza and Defeo (2015) and complemented it with a literature search (Almar et al, 2019; Bascom , 1951; Bujalesky , 2007; Carranza‐Edwards et al, 1998; Carrasco et al, 2009; Cesaraccio et al, 2004; Cuevas et al, 2010; Díaz‐Sánchez et al, 2014; Isla & Bujalesky, 2005; Ivamy & Kench, 2006; Karunarathna et al , 2016; Lefebvre et al, 2014; Maurer & Johnson, 2017; Norcross et al, 2002; Pino & Jaramillo, 1992; Poulos et al, 2013; Reis & Gama, 2009; Rodríguez‐Polo et al, 2018; Sénéchal, 2017; S06). Foreshore beach slopes are provided for 308 beaches worldwide (Figure 1a), ranging from 0.005 to 0.20, with a median value of 0.04 and a mean value of 0.055. β gc : Globally constant, time‐invariant beach face slope.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mase suggested a = 1.86 and b = 0.71, based on his laboratory tests [32] . Several field tests have been conducted by various authors, but they were mostly located on high-wave-energy coasts of the United States, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain or Australia [23] , [28] , [33] , [34] . One study for the Baltic sea could be identified, to our best knowledge, albeit it did not include any adjustments of parameters [35] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%