2020
DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
85
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
85
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with Dellal et al’s results [ 5 ], which showed that aerobic performance improved by 5.1% and 6.6% over the six-week high intensity intermittent and soccer small-sided games training. Similarly, Arslan et al [ 23 ] reported that there was no significant difference between high-intensity interval training and SSG concerning the improvement of VO 2 max values of young soccer players. The present study indicated that both skill-based training with maximum intensity and small-sided games equally affected VO 2 max improvement and/or its corresponding soccer performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are in line with Dellal et al’s results [ 5 ], which showed that aerobic performance improved by 5.1% and 6.6% over the six-week high intensity intermittent and soccer small-sided games training. Similarly, Arslan et al [ 23 ] reported that there was no significant difference between high-intensity interval training and SSG concerning the improvement of VO 2 max values of young soccer players. The present study indicated that both skill-based training with maximum intensity and small-sided games equally affected VO 2 max improvement and/or its corresponding soccer performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five studies included in this review (Radziminski et al, 2013 ; Faude et al, 2014 ; Jastrzebski et al, 2014 ; Stojiljković et al, 2019 ; Arslan et al, 2020 ) include a meta-comparison that revealed a significant favorable effect of running-based HIIT on linear sprinting. Additionally, a within-group analysis revealed a significant positive effect of running-based HIIT and a non-significant effect of SSG interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is fair to compare the protocols used among the included studies. For example, four of the studies (Faude et al, 2014 ; Jastrzebski et al, 2014 ; Stojiljković et al, 2019 ; Arslan et al, 2020 ) compared short-interval HIIT (15 s-to-15 s of work-to-rest) with long-interval SSG (2.5 min-to-4 min). Thus, it is admissible that, bioenergetically, the conditions of interventions are not the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with previous studies’ results [ 33 , 34 ], this study also showed that players in 3 vs. 3 and 4 vs. 4 SSGreg covered very low distances in the HIR zone (21.6 m and 15.8 m, respectively). Moreover, Lupo et al [ 35 ] and Arslan et al [ 36 ] reported that the training approach including the running-based training programme could be more effective in improving soccer players’ sprint performances and speed-based conditioning than that of the soccer-specific drills. In terms of external loads, the length of the SSG playing field could have restricted players from reaching high running speeds during SSG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%