2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumor Detection over Varying Time Windows

Abstract: This study determines the major difference between rumors and non-rumors and explores rumor classification performance levels over varying time windows—from the first three days to nearly two months. A comprehensive set of user, structural, linguistic, and temporal features was examined and their relative strength was compared from near-complete date of Twitter. Our contribution is at providing deep insight into the cumulative spreading patterns of rumors over time as well as at tracking the precise changes in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
157
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(27 reference statements)
5
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most important (and interesting) cases are when the delay in that decision could also have negative or risky implications. This scenario, known as "early risk detection" have gained increasing interest in recent years with potential applications in rumor detection (Ma et al, 2015(Ma et al, , 2016Kwon et al, 2017), sexual predator detection and aggressive text identification (Escalante et al, 2017), depression detection (Losada et al, 2017;Losada & Crestani, 2016) or terrorism detection (Iskandar, 2017).…”
Section: Analysis Of Sequential Data: Early Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most important (and interesting) cases are when the delay in that decision could also have negative or risky implications. This scenario, known as "early risk detection" have gained increasing interest in recent years with potential applications in rumor detection (Ma et al, 2015(Ma et al, , 2016Kwon et al, 2017), sexual predator detection and aggressive text identification (Escalante et al, 2017), depression detection (Losada et al, 2017;Losada & Crestani, 2016) or terrorism detection (Iskandar, 2017).…”
Section: Analysis Of Sequential Data: Early Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracing the diffusion path and inferring the network structure are two expensive features that cannot be obtained in the early stage of news propagation, while using textual and user sequence features act consistently good even in the beginning of diffusion, when the information is partially available [28].…”
Section: B Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spreading dynamics is an important issue in spreading and controlling [1][2][3] of 2 rumor [4][5][6][7] and disease [8][9][10][11], marketing [12], recommending [13][14][15], source 3 detecting [16,17], and many other interesting topics [18][19][20][21][22]. How to predict the 4 infection probability [23], infected scale [24,25], and even the infected nodes precisely 5 has been gotten much attention in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%