2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumination and the mood-as-input hypothesis: Does congruence matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of perseverative psychopathologies, a couple of studies support the predictions of the mood-as-input model for pathological worrying, perseverative checking, and depressive rumination (Meeten & Davey, 2011). Most relevant to the present research are four published studies on depressive rumination, which confirmed the expected interaction pattern between mood and stop rule for a rumination interview in a nonclinical sample (Hawksley & Davey, 2010), especially if the content of the interview was mood congruent (Fisak, Kissinger-Knox, & Cibrian, 2018). Furthermore, it was found that high ruminators continued longer in the enough and control conditions compared to the enjoy condition and compared to low ruminators in either condition (Watkins & Mason, 2002).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of perseverative psychopathologies, a couple of studies support the predictions of the mood-as-input model for pathological worrying, perseverative checking, and depressive rumination (Meeten & Davey, 2011). Most relevant to the present research are four published studies on depressive rumination, which confirmed the expected interaction pattern between mood and stop rule for a rumination interview in a nonclinical sample (Hawksley & Davey, 2010), especially if the content of the interview was mood congruent (Fisak, Kissinger-Knox, & Cibrian, 2018). Furthermore, it was found that high ruminators continued longer in the enough and control conditions compared to the enjoy condition and compared to low ruminators in either condition (Watkins & Mason, 2002).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…On the other hand, similar studies in the context of physical pain have revealed mood and stop-rule main effects in absence of significant interactions (Ceulemans, Karsdorp, & Vlaeyen, 2013). Stop-rule main effects were also observed when the affective content of a rumination interview was incongruent with the mood induction (Fisak et al, 2018). Importantly, our findings are in accordance with several lines of research on motivational deficits in depression and dysphoria regarding approach motivation and task engagement (Brinkmann & Franzen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly to notice, the suggested importance of mood in the path linking contact with nature to rumination appears in line with the "mood as input theory" (Watkins & Mason, 2002). As highlighted in Fisak, Kissinger-Knox, and Cibrian (2018), this theory predicts that persistence on a perseverative task, such as ruminative thinking, is strongly influenced by negative mood, which signals a lack of achievement or unsuccessful completion of the task leading the individual to perseverate, or ruminate, for an extended period of time. Mood restoration, therefore, might be crucial for individuals to disengage from ruminative thinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%