1949
DOI: 10.1071/bi9490304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumenal Flora Studies in the Sheep I. The Nutritive Value of Rumen Bacterial Protein

Abstract: SummaryTwo large satnples of "mixed" rumen bacteria, virtually free from protozoa and feed residues, were prepared from abattoir sheep, one from sheep coming from "green" feed conditions and the other from "dry"-fed sheep.The "true" digestibilities and biological values of the crude protein of these preparations were determined by nitrogen-balance method with young growing rats and compared with "standard" casein. The cyst ( e) ine and methionine contents of the rumen bacteria samples and of "whole" protein pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1954
1954
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found to be 80. This did not differ significantly from the biological value of rumen bacteria which was found in this same work to be 81, compared with 88 found by McNaught, Smith, Henry & Kon(90) and 79 found by Reed, Moir & Underwood (91). There was, however, a marked difference in the true digestibility of the nitrogen in the dried protozoa as compared with that in the dried bacteria, the values being 91 and 74% respectively.…”
Section: Rumen Protozoacontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…It was found to be 80. This did not differ significantly from the biological value of rumen bacteria which was found in this same work to be 81, compared with 88 found by McNaught, Smith, Henry & Kon(90) and 79 found by Reed, Moir & Underwood (91). There was, however, a marked difference in the true digestibility of the nitrogen in the dried protozoa as compared with that in the dried bacteria, the values being 91 and 74% respectively.…”
Section: Rumen Protozoacontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Experiments have been done to determine the nutritive value of rumen bacteria (Johnson, Hamilton, Robinson & Garey, 1944;Reed, Moir & Underwood, 1949; McNaught, Smith, Henry & Kon, 1950) by feeding bacterial preparations to rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of studies by Reed et al (1949) indicated that rumen bacterial methionine increased while the qrstine content did not change when samples from lambs fed "green" feed were caq)ared with the sangles from lambs fed "dry" feed. Weller (1957) studied the amino add com position of rumen microorganisms in the rumm fluid from sheep fed four different rations.…”
Section: Hogan (1961) Presented Evidence Showing That the Absorptim Omentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The total nitrogen content of a protozoa preparation containing mostly holotrichs as analyzed by Oxford (1951)# was observed to be from 1.1 to 1.6 per cent nitrogen, and a preparation containing both holotrichs and oligotrichs contained 3*5 per cent nitrogen. While, as McNaught et i^95^) observed, these differences may be due to a variation in protozoa carbohydrate storage, it is possible that there are differences in total nitrogen content between rumen protozoa genera and between rumen bac teria and rumen protozoa* Rumen bacteria appear to have a uniform total nitrogen content between seven and nine per cent (Johnson et al, 1944;Reed ^ al,, 1949;McNaught et ri., 1954;Abdoetjl., 1964 Heed eb (1949) found that the digestibility of rumen bacteria tqr rats was similar to sanqples of bacteria from sheep fed either "green" feed w "diy" feed, but the bacteria were much lover in digestibility in coB^arison to casein. These authors stated that rumen bacterial protein must be regarded as low in digestibility, relatively high In biological value, and mildly deficient in methionine.…”
Section: Hogan (1961) Presented Evidence Showing That the Absorptim Omentioning
confidence: 99%