“…As one manifestation of this trend, cities from Seattle to Louisville and Monterrey to Rotterdam have joined approximately 90 others to affirm an international Charter for Compassion and, as a part of that affirmation, developed plans to make their respective cities more compassionate. This interest in compassion emerges amidst ongoing restructuring of state involvement in welfare regimes, unfolding crises for migrants-that are also often imagined as crises for cities or nation-states-and longstanding patterns of injustice at the intersections of race, class, gender and sexuality that structure individual cities and stretch beyond them to the uneven distributions of wealth, violence and precarity that characterize the contemporary world (Davies and Isakjee 2018;Derickson 2017a;Mezzadra and Neilson 2013). Indeed, in the United States, which has been a central, but not exclusive, location of cities affirming the charter, the empowerment of white supremacist and xenophobic nationalist organizing, the increasing visibility of progressive liberal and left movements around immigrant justice, interfaith anti-Islamophobia and racial justice organizing, and emerging centrist concerns about populism and polarization together form an important context for the politics of urban commitments to compassion.…”