2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rubredoxin as a paramagnetic relaxation-inducing probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 As mentioned, the presence of 2 equiv of [GdÀDOTAM] 3+ does not induce by itself chemical shift perturbations on the rubredoxin amide resonances larger than 0.02 ppm (data not shown), as expected for the interaction of such a lanthanide probe with an isotropic distribution of its unpaired electrons.…”
Section: 51supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28 As mentioned, the presence of 2 equiv of [GdÀDOTAM] 3+ does not induce by itself chemical shift perturbations on the rubredoxin amide resonances larger than 0.02 ppm (data not shown), as expected for the interaction of such a lanthanide probe with an isotropic distribution of its unpaired electrons.…”
Section: 51supporting
confidence: 61%
“…This might be due, as postulated by us and other authors, 28,47 to small conformational rearrangements of the cytochrome upon ligand binding, thus altering the chemical environment of the other heme groups. The lack of line broadening excludes direct binding of the paramagnetic probe in the vicinity of the other heme groups, as the presence of Gd implies that these chemical shifts cannot be due to long-range pseudocontact shifts.…”
Section: Shown) This Results Indicates That There Is No Interaction Bmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samples consisted of one part of this solution and one part glycerol. Rubredoxin from Desulfovibrio gigas [30,31] was purified according to a previously reported method [32]. To ensure that no other metal forms of rubredoxin, other than iron, were present in the sample, the protein was injected in a 6 ml Resource Q column (GE Biosciences) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6 buffer and eluted in a linear NaCl gradient (0-500 mM in buffer).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BiGGER has been used in the last decade to obtain structural models of several electron transfer and proteinprotein complexes [8][9][10], in most cases when the threedimensional structures of the proteins involved are available and the residues at the interface are either not known or known only for one of the partners. Although the coordinates used are considered as ''rigid bodies'', the algorithm offers an option called ''soft-docking'' that takes into account the conformational freedom of some of the surface residue side chains, such as lysine, to assist the prediction of the mode of binding of the two proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%