2011
DOI: 10.1021/ic200858c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gd(III) Chelates as NMR Probes of Protein–Protein Interactions. Case Study: Rubredoxin and Cytochromec3

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Two cyclen-derived Gd probes, [GdÀDOTAM] 3+ and [GdÀDOTP] 5À (DOTAM = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetamide; DOTP = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrakis(methylenephosphonate)), were assessed as paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE)-inducing probes for characterization of proteinÀprotein interactions. Two proteins, Desulfovibrio gigas rubredoxin and Desulfovibrio gigas cytochrome c 3 , were used as model partners. In a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential binding site of [Ln(L) 3 ] n − ( n =3 for L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , and L 5 ; n =6 for L 4 ) in ubiquitin : Because the paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) is very sensitive parameter that is used to detect the binding interface of a protein, 6b, c, d residues that experience strong PREs are generally located close to the paramagnetic center. To determine the binding site of the [Ln(L) 3 ] n − complexes, we performed PRE measurements by using [Gd(DPA) 3 ] 3− , [Gd(L 3 ) 3 ] 3− , and [Gd(L 4 ) 3 ] 6− .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential binding site of [Ln(L) 3 ] n − ( n =3 for L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , and L 5 ; n =6 for L 4 ) in ubiquitin : Because the paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) is very sensitive parameter that is used to detect the binding interface of a protein, 6b, c, d residues that experience strong PREs are generally located close to the paramagnetic center. To determine the binding site of the [Ln(L) 3 ] n − complexes, we performed PRE measurements by using [Gd(DPA) 3 ] 3− , [Gd(L 3 ) 3 ] 3− , and [Gd(L 4 ) 3 ] 6− .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Ln(DPA) 3 ] 3− was first reported to bind specifically to a protein that had a positively charged surface and significant PCS values were observed for a number of proteins 6a. As a consequence, this noncovalent interaction was used to generate PREs 6bd. Because DPA is symmetrical, the obtained paramagnetic Δ χ tensors are rather similar for a number of paramagnetic lanthanide ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lanthanide incorporation is a promising strategy to expand the utility of fluorescence and NMR in examining large biopolymers, offering the ability to evaluate protein dynamics [5], protein conformational changes [24, 44], and interactions of larger proteins than have previously been studied [7, 22]. However, the requirement for site-specific incorporation, coupled with the need for a lanthanide chelator, have limited its use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the LBT’s rather large size, which may interfere with proper folding and/or function of the target protein, has prompted efforts to pursue small molecule lanthanide chelators [2023]. Small molecule lanthanide chelators such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its derivatives 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) exhibit attomolar affinity for lanthanide metals and have been used for decades for their superior luminescence intensities [11, 24], and more recently, for NMR experiments [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sPRE experiments based on the interactions of the two probes with the surface of the proteins allowed to gain information about charged patches on the protein surface and to characterize the binding site in the protein complex. 14 As each of the paramagnetic effects has its peculiarities, it is emphasized that combining restraints based on PCSs, RDCs and PREs is a safeguard against biased results. For example, structure calculations based only on PREs may be prone to bias toward minor states, because the PREs are so sensitive to those.…”
Section: The New Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%