a b s t r a c tThe nature of the first excited state of [Fe(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ has been reinvestigated. In contrast to previous findings, it is metal-to-ligand charge transfer in nature, thus fitting in the series of the Ru and Os complexes.Ó 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Recently, a report has been published concerning theoretical calculations on the lowest excited states of [M(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ and [M(4-(4-(t-butyl)phenyl)terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ 2 (M = Fe, Ru, and Os) complexes calculated using the TD-DFT approach [1]. A difference was claimed between the character of the lowest transition of [Fe(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ and that of the other five considered compounds: whereas the iron complex had intraligand (IL) p-p * character, the lowest transitions of the Ru and Os complexes were predominantly metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excitations. In order to gain insight into this remarkable difference [2-3], we have undertaken a computational study at the same level of theory (B3LYP/LANL2-DZ) as the original authors and found that our results for [Fe(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ differ from those previously reported.Optimisation of the geometry at the B3LYP/LANL2-DZ level [4] resulted in an identical geometry as reported in [1], identified as a local minimum by normal mode analysis. The orbital energies agreed with the reported values within 0.02 eV. Our TD-DFT [5] results also agreed well with those of Zhou et al. (Table 1 and Tables S1-S3), aside from one low-energy transition with zero oscillator strength (f). In line with the previous study, the first electronic transition with non-zero oscillator strength (f = 0.0122) can be assigned to a degenerate HOMO ? LUMO/HOMO ? LUMO+1 pair transition. The energy of this transition (2.59 eV) agrees with the experimental value of 2.25 eV in aqueous solution [3].The difference between our results and the reported study is the nature of the orbitals involved in this transition, on which the assignment of the character of this transition is based. In contrast to the original findings that the HOMO of [Fe(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ is ligand-based [1], we find that the HOMO is predominantly metalbased (Fig. 1, Fig. S1 and Table S2). Hence, the current calculations demonstrate that this lowest-energy absorption in [Fe(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ has MLCT character, instead of IL character. These results thus eliminate the reported difference between the Fe complex and its Ru and Os congeners and lead to overall consistency in the set [M(terpyridine) 2 ] 2+ (M = Fe, Ru and Os).The assignment of this transition to a MLCT transition is independent of basis set: enlargement of the basis to the Ahlrichs-pVDZ basis set [6] or to the non-relativistic cc-pVTZ basis for Fe and to the cc-pVDZ basis set [7] for the other atoms gives similar results. The first non-vanishing transition originates from the metal-based HOMO, Table 1, Tables S4-S7 and Figs. S2-S3; the first visible transition still corresponds to a HOMO ? LUMO/HOMO ? LUMO+1 excitation and the HOMO consists mainly of an Fe d-orbita...