1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80602-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RS 33 Bacterial penetration preceded by pH changes in in vitro leakage studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their finding showed that microleakage of the small molecules (butyric acid or methylene blue dye) could not be prevented, whereas leakage of bacteria-sized particles (latex beads) and large-sized protein molecules (endotoxin) could be prevented only when both sealer and vertical pressure were used in obturation techniques. More recently, Moshonov et al (1995) used S. epidermidis to detect the leakage of three root canal sealers: AH26, Roth 801 and Ketac-Endo by monitoring the turbidity of the broth and colour change of a phenol red dye in the lower chamber. They found that colour change occurred significantly earlier than the turbidity ofthe broth and the Roth 801 group allowed bacterial penetration significantly less than the other two groups (P<0.05).…”
Section: Discussion ;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their finding showed that microleakage of the small molecules (butyric acid or methylene blue dye) could not be prevented, whereas leakage of bacteria-sized particles (latex beads) and large-sized protein molecules (endotoxin) could be prevented only when both sealer and vertical pressure were used in obturation techniques. More recently, Moshonov et al (1995) used S. epidermidis to detect the leakage of three root canal sealers: AH26, Roth 801 and Ketac-Endo by monitoring the turbidity of the broth and colour change of a phenol red dye in the lower chamber. They found that colour change occurred significantly earlier than the turbidity ofthe broth and the Roth 801 group allowed bacterial penetration significantly less than the other two groups (P<0.05).…”
Section: Discussion ;mentioning
confidence: 99%