2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Round robin comparison on quantitative nanometer scale magnetic field measurements by magnetic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3b shows the simulated domain transition together with = tanh . The excellent agreement justifies to introduce domain walls based on a Bloch wall domain kernel [Appendix D] as discussed in [21].…”
Section: B)) a Self-correlation-based Analysis [Appendix B] Gives An Average Domain Width Ofmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3b shows the simulated domain transition together with = tanh . The excellent agreement justifies to introduce domain walls based on a Bloch wall domain kernel [Appendix D] as discussed in [21].…”
Section: B)) a Self-correlation-based Analysis [Appendix B] Gives An Average Domain Width Ofmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The different approaches and characterization routes that will be used are summarized in the validation flow diagram (Figure 2). We start with the topmost branch, the micromagnetic simulations, and progress with qMFM based on a calibration using a pre-existing Co/Pt multilayer reference sample [16,21] in the following depicted as 'ref'. The characterizations culminate in a cross validation, where the pre-existing Co/Pt reference sample is characterized by qMFM calibrated using the Ti/Pt/Co sample.…”
Section: B)) a Self-correlation-based Analysis [Appendix B] Gives An Average Domain Width Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations