2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough-Legged Buzzards, Arctic Foxes and Red Foxes in a Tundra Ecosystem without Rodents

Abstract: Small rodents with multi-annual population cycles strongly influence the dynamics of food webs, and in particular predator-prey interactions, across most of the tundra biome. Rodents are however absent from some arctic islands, and studies on performance of arctic predators under such circumstances may be very instructive since rodent cycles have been predicted to collapse in a warming Arctic. Here we document for the first time how three normally rodent-dependent predator species—rough-legged buzzard, arctic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that population, mean clutch size and mean brood size were also higher with 4.4 and 4.0, respectively (Beardsell et al, ), than in southern Yamal (mean clutch size = 3.1 and mean brood size = 1.3). In populations relying partly or completely on other prey than small rodents, both densities and clutch/brood size were lower and similar to the ones observed at Erkuta after 2005 (Pokrovsky et al, , ). Particularly high breeding densities have been reported from Fennoscandia, where buzzards reached 25 pairs per 100 km 2 in peak small rodent years (Hellström et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In that population, mean clutch size and mean brood size were also higher with 4.4 and 4.0, respectively (Beardsell et al, ), than in southern Yamal (mean clutch size = 3.1 and mean brood size = 1.3). In populations relying partly or completely on other prey than small rodents, both densities and clutch/brood size were lower and similar to the ones observed at Erkuta after 2005 (Pokrovsky et al, , ). Particularly high breeding densities have been reported from Fennoscandia, where buzzards reached 25 pairs per 100 km 2 in peak small rodent years (Hellström et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In northern Fennoscandia, they are small rodent specialists (Tast et al, ), with a preference for Norwegian lemmings as prey (Hellström et al, ). In other areas, however, they are less specialized and use birds, notably ptarmigan, as alternative prey in low small rodent years (Pokrovsky et al, ; Springer, ), or breed even in areas where small rodents are absent, such as on Kolguev Island (Pokrovsky et al, ). None of these studies documented; however, the reaction of a buzzard population to a change in resource availability over time, and it was therefore unclear how fast they could adapt to such changes locally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Juvenile summertime survival of Arctic-breeding birds including geese has earlier been strongly linked to the cyclical abundance of and concomitant levels of predation on Arctic rodents Arvicolinae in the 'alternative prey hypothesis' (Summers and Underhill 1987). However, Kolguev Island lacks lemmings and their associated cycle (Kondratyev and Zaynagutdinova 2008;Kruckenberg et al 2008), and young geese form the regular, main prey of most predators there (Pokrovsky et al 2015). This is shown to result in strong family size decreases between hatching (early July; mean ≈ 3) and fledging (end July; mean ≈ 2; see Kondratyev and Zaynagutdinova 2008).…”
Section: Autumn Migration and Family Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Montagu's harriers Circus pygargus diet diversification, as a consequence of reductions of traditional prey resources, has been correlated with lower breeding success (Arroyo and Garcia 2006). However, responses are variable and important factors to consider are the level of intensification of land use and the ability for individual plasticity to occur within the species of concern (Pokrovsky et al 2015). The classification of generalist or specialist can occur along a gradient of adaptability and furthermore, a generalist species can be made up of specialized individuals (Bolnick et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%