Rotifer Symposium V 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0465-1_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotifers as food in aquaculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
64
0
12

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
64
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Dry matter content, caloric value and chemical composition establish the nutritional value of rotifers, and are determined by size and nutritional state (Lubzens et al 1989;Go¤ mez et al 2002;Lubzens & Zmora 2003;Baer et al 2008). According to Lubzens and Zmora (2003), rotifer's protein content ranges between 28% and 63%, lipid from 9% to 28%, and carbohydrate from 10.5% to 27% of the dry weight (DW).…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dry matter content, caloric value and chemical composition establish the nutritional value of rotifers, and are determined by size and nutritional state (Lubzens et al 1989;Go¤ mez et al 2002;Lubzens & Zmora 2003;Baer et al 2008). According to Lubzens and Zmora (2003), rotifer's protein content ranges between 28% and 63%, lipid from 9% to 28%, and carbohydrate from 10.5% to 27% of the dry weight (DW).…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when cultured on yeast alone, rotifers are poor in HUFAs required for normal development and good survival of marine ¢sh larvae. DHA, EPA and arachidonic acid (20:4n-6; ARA) contents can, however, be manipulated by short-or long-term feeding with selected microalgae species, lipid emulsions, lipid-rich microcapsules and other feed types, as mentioned above (Lubzens et al 1989;Rainuzzo et al 1997;Lubzens & Zmora 2003). Despite the high crude protein content of rotifers, the availability of rotifer protein to marine ¢sh larvae is of concern (Srivastava, Hamre & Stoss 2006).…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…energy gain was apparently not the case for the high-density group of turbot and the increased enzyme level did not seem to result in a sufficiently high increase in digestive capacity to compensate for a shorter retention of prey in the gut. Even though high prey densities have frequently been beneficial for growth and survival of fish larvae (Houde, 1975;Dowd & Houde, 1980;Buckley et al, 1993), a reverse effect has also been reported for fish larvae of other species (Lubzens et al, 1989). The lipid content of rotifers did not affect the content of BSDL in turbot larvae, suggesting no stimulating effect on the BSDL synthesis during the early larval stages by the dietary lipid level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For short-term storage, amictic female rotifers can be preserved at temperatures ranging from -2 and + 8 ∞ C, [12][13][14] while resting eggs can be used for long-term preservation. 1,15,16 Preserved rotifers at low temperature can be a source for direct feeding of fish larvae, while resting eggs can be seeds for mass culture. 1,15,16 Monogonont rotifers have cyclic heterogony, in that they alternate parthenogenetic generations with bisexual generations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,15,16 Preserved rotifers at low temperature can be a source for direct feeding of fish larvae, while resting eggs can be seeds for mass culture. 1,15,16 Monogonont rotifers have cyclic heterogony, in that they alternate parthenogenetic generations with bisexual generations. Sexual reproduction is induced by internal and external factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%