The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01279-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ross-Konno procedure in neonates: report of three patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports emphasizing outcomes in the neonatal or infant population have cited various risk factors for mortality-younger age, associated arch or mitral valve disease, emergency presentation with severe aortic insufficiency after balloon dilatation, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and/or myocardial ischemia, postoperative mechanical circulatory support, and suitability for biventricular repair. [1][2][3]5,6,14,15,17,[21][22][23] Although risk factor analysis was not a primary objective of our study because of the nature of the database, we did observe higher mortality in neonates in comparison with infants. Mortality was also higher in patients who had concomitant arch repair or received postoperative mechanical circulatory support.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports emphasizing outcomes in the neonatal or infant population have cited various risk factors for mortality-younger age, associated arch or mitral valve disease, emergency presentation with severe aortic insufficiency after balloon dilatation, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and/or myocardial ischemia, postoperative mechanical circulatory support, and suitability for biventricular repair. [1][2][3]5,6,14,15,17,[21][22][23] Although risk factor analysis was not a primary objective of our study because of the nature of the database, we did observe higher mortality in neonates in comparison with infants. Mortality was also higher in patients who had concomitant arch repair or received postoperative mechanical circulatory support.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…2 Numerous other reports describe individual center's experiences with 1 or more technique of AVR in the pediatric age group, but offer little information specific to neonates or infants. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Contemporary benchmark data based on a larger multicenter cohort of neonates and infants undergoing AVR could potentially improve our understanding of outcomes in this challenging group of patients. We therefore sought to describe characteristics and outcomes for neonates and infants undergoing AVR across a large multi-institutional cohort using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other surgical options available in neonates with critical aortic stenosis, like the Ross or Ross-Konno procedures, have not be taken in consideration in the above multi-institutional study, despite previous positive reports [19][20][21][22][23]. In fact the above study could not better recommend the Ross-Konno procedure for neonates with critical aortic stenosis.…”
Section: Aortic Valve Stenosismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,2 The operation is suitable for neonates or infants with critical aortic stenosis who show unacceptable results following open or balloon valvotomy. [1][2][3]9 Some newborns with critical aortic stenosis, a hypoplastic aortic annulus (<5 mm), and significant EFE can be effectively treated by the primary Ross-Konno procedure and resection of EFE, thus avoiding single ventricular palliation. The Ross-Konno procedure allows easy access to the left ventricular cavity for resection of EFE, normalizing the LVOT and the long axis of the left ventricle.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,5 The Ross-Konno procedure is applicable in patients with an interrupted aortic arch as the initial procedure or after primary repair in patients with a severely restricted subaortic area, hypoplastic aortic annulus, and bicuspid valve. 6,9 Decreasing Mortality and Morbidity. Estimated risk of in-hospital mortality is close to 10%.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%