Abstract:Ramsey rootstock has previously been
implicated in an approximate
8-fold increase of 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) levels in the
rachis (grape bunch stem) of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz scions over own-rooted Shiraz vines at harvest. IBMP
extracted from rachis during red wine fermentation can contribute
potent “green” flavors. Methoxypyrazines (MPs) are normally
present in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes, rachis, and wines, but it is
unknown whether rootstocks can influence the MP concentration in the
rachis.… Show more
“…The analysis of IBMP variability at bunch and vine levels has seemingly not been reported before but has been shown to be a dynamic feature of a vineyard at the block level [ 32 ]. Furthermore, vine vigour differences were deemed to result in spatial variability in IBMP across a vineyard [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vine canopy architecture parameters (leaf area index, LAI and normalised difference vegetation index, NDVI), vine size (vegetative growth and yield), and soil EC a have been shown to correlate to grape maturity measures [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 37 ], and Figure 1 and Figure 2 demonstrate the change in grape heterogeneity relative to maturity. As such, this investigation considered whether overall grape heterogeneity might have an inverse relationship with these vine attributes and soil EC a .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methoxypyrazines were extracted according to Dunlevy et al [ 45 ] and analysed by stable isotope dilution assay with headspace SPME-GC-MS following the previously reported procedure [ 14 ], with the inclusion of deuterated internal standards d 3 -IPMP and d 3 -SBMP for quantification of IPMP and SBMP, respectively [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been growing interest in managing grape heterogeneity to achieve high-quality wine, with recent work focussing on the use of remote sensing and precision viticulture to address variability across a vineyard [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Differences in vineyard soil type and depth are considered significant driving forces for grape maturity variability as these geophysical parameters correlate to vine vigour and yield, which in turn alter berry composition [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Uniform grape maturity can be sought by producers to minimise underripe and/or overripe proportions of fruit and limit any undesirable effects on wine quality. Considering that grape heterogeneity is a multifaceted phenomenon, a composite index summarising overall grape heterogeneity was developed to benefit vineyard management and harvest date decisions. A grape heterogeneity index (GHI) was constructed by aggregating the sum of absolute residuals multiplied by the range of values from measurements of total soluble solids, pH, fresh weight, total tannins, absorbance at 520 nm (red colour), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine, and malic acid. Management of grape heterogeneity was also studied, using Cabernet Sauvignon grapes grown under four viticultural regimes (normal/low crop load, full/deficit irrigation) during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons. Comparisons of GHI scores showed grape variability decreased throughout ripening in both vintages, then significantly increased at the harvest time point in 2020, but plateaued on sample dates nearing the harvest date in 2021. Irrigation and crop load had no effect on grape heterogeneity by the time of harvest in both vintages. Larger vine yield, leaf area index, and pruning weight significantly increased GHI score early in ripening, but no significant relationship was found at the time of harvest. Differences in the Ravaz index, normalised difference vegetation index, and soil electrical conductivity did not significantly change the GHI score.
“…The analysis of IBMP variability at bunch and vine levels has seemingly not been reported before but has been shown to be a dynamic feature of a vineyard at the block level [ 32 ]. Furthermore, vine vigour differences were deemed to result in spatial variability in IBMP across a vineyard [ 21 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vine canopy architecture parameters (leaf area index, LAI and normalised difference vegetation index, NDVI), vine size (vegetative growth and yield), and soil EC a have been shown to correlate to grape maturity measures [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 37 ], and Figure 1 and Figure 2 demonstrate the change in grape heterogeneity relative to maturity. As such, this investigation considered whether overall grape heterogeneity might have an inverse relationship with these vine attributes and soil EC a .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methoxypyrazines were extracted according to Dunlevy et al [ 45 ] and analysed by stable isotope dilution assay with headspace SPME-GC-MS following the previously reported procedure [ 14 ], with the inclusion of deuterated internal standards d 3 -IPMP and d 3 -SBMP for quantification of IPMP and SBMP, respectively [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been growing interest in managing grape heterogeneity to achieve high-quality wine, with recent work focussing on the use of remote sensing and precision viticulture to address variability across a vineyard [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Differences in vineyard soil type and depth are considered significant driving forces for grape maturity variability as these geophysical parameters correlate to vine vigour and yield, which in turn alter berry composition [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Uniform grape maturity can be sought by producers to minimise underripe and/or overripe proportions of fruit and limit any undesirable effects on wine quality. Considering that grape heterogeneity is a multifaceted phenomenon, a composite index summarising overall grape heterogeneity was developed to benefit vineyard management and harvest date decisions. A grape heterogeneity index (GHI) was constructed by aggregating the sum of absolute residuals multiplied by the range of values from measurements of total soluble solids, pH, fresh weight, total tannins, absorbance at 520 nm (red colour), 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine, and malic acid. Management of grape heterogeneity was also studied, using Cabernet Sauvignon grapes grown under four viticultural regimes (normal/low crop load, full/deficit irrigation) during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons. Comparisons of GHI scores showed grape variability decreased throughout ripening in both vintages, then significantly increased at the harvest time point in 2020, but plateaued on sample dates nearing the harvest date in 2021. Irrigation and crop load had no effect on grape heterogeneity by the time of harvest in both vintages. Larger vine yield, leaf area index, and pruning weight significantly increased GHI score early in ripening, but no significant relationship was found at the time of harvest. Differences in the Ravaz index, normalised difference vegetation index, and soil electrical conductivity did not significantly change the GHI score.
“…7 In contrast, while VvOMT1 and 2 are capable of converting HPs to MPs, they have more than 200fold greater specific activity for compounds other than IBHP (such as quercetin, a flavonol) and the timing of expression is unrelated to changes in IBHP and IBMP concentrations. 10,11 The VvOMT4 expression profile closely resembles VvOMT3, but its copy number is 100 to 4000 times lower, 6 and VvOMT4 shows low levels of activity against HP substrates. 7 Curiously, V. vinifera varieties such as Shiraz and Pinot Noir 8,12 that are unable to produce MPs in the berry due to epigenetic differences in the regulation of VvOMT3 expression 13 have high concentrations of IBMP in the rachis 12 and tendrils 8 despite negligible levels of VvOMT3 expression and highly variable IBHP concentrations.…”
Methoxypyrazines (MPs) are potent aroma compounds that
have been
predominately studied in grape berries but can also be detected in
other vine tissues. The synthesis of MPs in berries from hydroxypyrazines
by VvOMT3 is well established, but the origin of MPs in vine tissues
that have negligible VvOMT3 gene expression is unknown.
This research gap was addressed through the application of stable
isotope tracer 3-isobutyl-2-hydroxy-[2H2]-pyrazine
(d
2-IBHP) to the roots of Pinot Meunier
L1 microvines and high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) quantification of HPs from grapevine
tissues following a novel solid-phase extraction method. Four weeks
post-application, d
2-IBHP and its O-methylated product 3-isobutyl-2-methoxy-[2H2]-pyrazine (d
2-IBMP) were present
in excised cane, berry, leaf, root, and rachis material. Translocation
of d
2-IBHP and d
2-IBMP was investigated, but results were inconclusive. Nonetheless,
knowledge that d
2-IBHP, and potentially d
2-IBMP, are translocated from roots to other
vine organs, including the berries, could provide opportunities for
controlling MP accumulation in grapevine tissues pertinent to winemaking.
BackgroundThe influences of abscisic acid (ABA) applications on precursors and genes expression in 3‐alkyl‐2‐methoxypyrazines (MPs) biosynthetic pathway, MPs concentration and sensory evaluation of its derived peculiar odors in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines were studied. At the vineyard, ABA solution with 25, 100 and 400 mg/L (AT1, AT2 and AT3, respectively) and an aqueous solution (Control) were sprayed three times from veraison to pre‐harvest.ResultsHigher concentration ABA applications (AT2 and AT3) in grapes could significantly reduce MPs concentration and its derived peculiar odors in grapes and wines than lower concentration ABA application (AT1) and control, with AT2 application having the strongest effect. The changes in MPs were mainly due to the downregulated expression of VvOMTs genes at higher concentration ABA applications, independent of the levels of their potential precursors.ConclusionOur study reveals that ABA application had the potential to decrease production of MPs in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines, and this result provides reference values for the removal of unpleasant vegetable odors from Cabernet Sauvignon wines in production.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.